davidy123

7 ms·

31.
by davidy123 3y ago
No it is not. In the mainstream, is either that Palestinians should have full access to their historical lands, or at its extreme that it should be a fully Palestinian state. Of course some people on the fringes take it further. From the no
32.
by davidy123 3y ago
I don't think it is contradicting the first part, but I was wondering about the second part since it is based on DIDs. I think it adds some important notes past that.
33.
by davidy123 3y ago
There is a good analysis here: https://neuromatch.social/@jonny/111885148573895886
34.
by davidy123 3y ago
This kind of approach could be a way to make these models reliable. Encode your business restrictions in the database, if they are rigorous enough, if the query passes then it's valid in your business world.
35.
by davidy123 3y ago
You have to jump through extra hoops, at least. I was able to install my own custom, unpublished extension easily with Kiwi.
36.
by davidy123 3y ago
On Android I use a two fisted approach; Chrome for things that require auth/payments, Kiwi for everything else. Kiwi is an open source fork of Chrome, and it allows extensions. Unfortunately it's not up to date to the latest (secu
37.
by davidy123 3y ago
It's fine to be future oriented, to share development, the problem is any religious destiny/racist element. I'm not sure what you mean by "woke disease," but consumerism involves evaluation. Oct 7 was horrible, but
38.
by davidy123 3y ago
Yes, but it's all relative. A giant new development is different than a branch office. Though in all cases there is no doubt overlap with their military industrial complex. But I don't think we will normally see such religious ext
39.
by davidy123 3y ago
It is directly associated with the deal they are making. Would you let that quote be used with a deal your company is making? Intel knows full well how this is being spun.
40.
by davidy123 3y ago
Apparently they have become strongly associated since that quote is part of the release for their new plant. It is sickening to me this kind of hard-right religious zealotry is part of decisions of tech companies. I am avoiding Intel as muc
41.
by davidy123 3y ago
"This investment, at a time when … wages war against utter wickedness, a war in which good must defeat evil, is an investment in the right and righteous values that spell progress for humanity" That is not a partner for creating l
42.
by davidy123 3y ago
I don't think it should be ok to copy the literal works, the example of it emitting large chunks of articles from NYT is egregious, but it should be ok for it to learn and synthesize anything it can see. It should ideally, for producer
43.
by davidy123 3y ago
I guess that "a desktop that is minimalist, distraction-free, and aesthetically pleasing" means Windows 2000 with transparent backgrounds.
44.
by davidy123 3y ago
Firefox is still there. There is more than Chromium based browsers. Safari uses its own engine. Gnome, KDE have their own browsers with their own engines, there are text browsers, experimental browsers, etc. There could be a completely new
45.
by davidy123 3y ago
"IE standards" makes no sense. Yes the big companies dominate web standards, but there are still multiple viable niche browsers that work by conforming to that spec, and an extensive spec validation framework anyone can use (web-p
46.
by davidy123 3y ago
Internet Explorer did not follow web standards, Chrome does, pretty religiously. That's a huge difference. And Safari and Edge are gaining ground, Safari is not based on Chrome anymore and there are a number of open source browsers bas
47.
by davidy123 3y ago
Debug everywhere or google controlled, those things seem diametrically opposed. Aside from the murky area of cookies, chrome isn't straying much from web standards. There's really not much reason to not use a browser, the compatib
48.
by davidy123 3y ago
"Cool" is not a great reason. Only having to develop something once that serves all users is great, though. Personally, I cannot stand apps, I only use them when absolutely required, using a PWA gets you all the security of the br
49.
by davidy123 3y ago
I think, one way or another, humans can address these problems. We've always been at relative risk. I know I'm a technological solutionist ("stupid" according to a sibling comment), but there's a way. My worry is th
50.
by davidy123 3y ago
ok, functionally kind of like Shadow DOM, but requires a compile step (which interacts with other compile steps and libraries in different ways I guess), and re-invents all the shadow DOM facilities like referencing local elements but with
51.
by davidy123 3y ago
I was trying to find a definition for "css modules," which the author links but the link is self-referential. I followed a few links, and I came across this: ".jsx files support both global CSS and CSS Modules. To enable the
52.
by davidy123 3y ago
It should not be "deep magic." That is the problem. It should be pretty ordinary for anyone to use it. I hope you and others are making libraries to improve the situation.
53.
by davidy123 3y ago
hmm did you read the entire thread? comments like «The problem is that _AP itself_ is hard to implement correctly and nontrivially in a way that scales», «I was surprised at how difficult I found the spec(s) to read compared to theoretical
54.
by davidy123 3y ago
Right on. Not only that, but from what I've read, the protocol is a mess. It lurches in a number of directions but doesn't successfully reach any of them. So it's really hard to develop for, you pretty much have to be an insi
55.
by davidy123 3y ago
Snow and ice. Deep snow, deep ice. Layers of ice, then snow, then ice, created within a couple hours. I think even if it slides off, that could cause some damage.
56.
by davidy123 3y ago
Recovery is just one factor, there is often a lot of overhead in use of chemicals, labour, etc. The more they are designed for this process, the more sense it makes, that goes along with modularity.
57.
by davidy123 3y ago
The comment I am replying to called it "routine maintenance." With this attitude (it can always be as bad as it is now), when will the change be? Never.
58.
by davidy123 3y ago
Isn't there something wrong to you if a "routine maintenance" takes a day? The whole thing makes me think of home renovation, apparently the majority of landfill is cast-off material because re-use isn't a consideration.
59.
by davidy123 3y ago
As long as you don't mind constantly removing snow from the panels, hopefully not damaging them in the process.
60.
by davidy123 3y ago
Thanks, I might use this site. I want some motorized bottom-up shades, but they are crazily expensive. Motorized kits are available for DIY motorized blinds, but they aren't bottom-up. I have some ideas on how to use them for bottom-up

More ›