davidu

28 ms·

331.
by davidu 12y ago
We're using it. (OpenDNS)
332.
by davidu 12y ago
Ok. That makes sense. You've changed my opinion. It's very far from our classical view of what a group is (where members are generally aware of other members, there is some semblance of leadership, rules, or hierarchy, etc.), but
333.
by davidu 12y ago
Yep, mathematically no longer safe.
334.
by davidu 12y ago
Whenever a news story refers to Anonymous as a group, you know that the author has a terrible misunderstanding of Anonymous. And whenever you see an expert refer to Anonymous as a group, you know that they are either being misquoted, or are
335.
by davidu 12y ago
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/storage/why-raid-5-stops-working-i...
336.
by davidu 12y ago
This is not, not, not how one should be using RAID. The math is clear that in sufficiently large disk systems, RAID5, RAID6, and friends, are all insufficient.
337.
by davidu 12y ago
That was a censorship attempt that was fat finger'd to cause a leak. We all knew what happened there.
338.
by davidu 12y ago
This has been a problem people thought had been happening for a while. It's only with this detailed analysis that the light is being cast on it. Now we can work on solutions. And we will.
339.
by davidu 12y ago
Awesome analysis of a rarely documented problem. By shining the light on this, solutions will be much easier to deploy.
340.
by davidu 12y ago
Your server is not handling the load.
341.
by davidu 12y ago
K9 isn't a firm being discussed here. Manu is an awesome guy who helps get companies off the ground.
342.
by davidu 12y ago
Nothing about a term sheet is realistically very binding. That goes both ways. If you break the terms, there's generally little recourse for the other side.
343.
by davidu 12y ago
RFC1918 will likely not work since NAT'd users will be using ZeroTier. But there is a solution to this EXACT problem. RFC6598! http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6598 I think they could safely use 100.64.0.0/10 -
344.
by davidu 12y ago
It's weird that they called it Hyperlapse two weeks after Microsoft Research published a paper on the exact same topic, with the exact same name: PDF here: https://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/redmond/
345.
by davidu 12y ago
In SaaS it's about $60m ARR with 40%+ CAGR, actually.
346.
by davidu 12y ago
Actually, on a percentage of zones signed basis, or queries issued, DNSSEC penetration shrinks each day. He mentions encryption since the vast majority of people believe DNSSEC provides some level of privacy, encryption, or security. Most
347.
by davidu 12y ago
Thanks. And really interesting site / idea. I've seen some before, but none quite as good.
348.
by davidu 12y ago
I'm more interested in what generated that chart? Was it some automated system / program / tool?
349.
by davidu 12y ago
People saying "she planned this" or that "she writes all legal-y" don't understand how this works. Consider that this is only a tiny snapshot of the entire (horrible) ordeal, selected by her lawyers to reflect the e
350.
by davidu 12y ago
I hope by both of them you mean the CMO and CEO. This woman has nothing to be embarrassed about, although I'm sure she is. Going public must have been a terrifyingly difficult thing to do. It certainly would have been for me.
351.
by davidu 12y ago
They domain will work, subdomains on at least no-ip.biz and no-ip.org aren't going to work.
352.
by davidu 12y ago
This is an incredible action by Microsoft, and the courts.
353.
by davidu 12y ago
Don't lie then, just search google and click through.
354.
by davidu 12y ago
Not a red flag not to share cap table. But you should see the grant as a percentage of fully-diluted outstanding stock, and you should know the preference on top of the cap table, and you should know the last granted strike price and if the
355.
by davidu 12y ago
It seems important to note that this was a study of 35 people. 35. That seems like a surprisingly low number from which to draw broad conclusions of brain activity for adults diagnosed with ADHD when they were children.
356.
by davidu 12y ago
You're suggesting that 8 people giving references are lying, or are scared of the candidate. I find that hypothesis totally absurd.
357.
by davidu 12y ago
How so?
358.
by davidu 12y ago
Your singular datapoint (which I would still question) doesn't change the facts in that report.
359.
by davidu 12y ago
You need to spend more time understanding Uber. If you do that, you'll already know this statement is wrong.
360.
by davidu 12y ago
Back-channel references are crucial. I can't imagine a scenario where I wouldn't do a number of them for a key hire. Hiring managers is very hard. It's important that you make sure it's a good fit. Back-channel refere

More ›