Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
davidcuddeback
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
61.
▲
by
davidcuddeback
6y ago
I'm not sure. I think a lack of metals makes a star less stable and burn out more quickly, but I could be wrong on that. There's some episodes of Astronomy Cast and Ask a Spaceman that I think would answer your question about
62.
▲
by
davidcuddeback
6y ago
No. Size is the dominant factor. Lifespan and what stages of fusion it undergoes are dependent on its size. The more massive the star, the shorter its life span. Red dwarf stars can live for trillions of years, but massive stars may live le
63.
▲
by
davidcuddeback
6y ago
Funny seeing this on HN. I worked at PolySat until 2010 (a year before that article was published), so I know most of those names. When I worked there, our avionics was embedded C on bare metal. We had several problems we were trying to sol
64.
▲
by
davidcuddeback
6y ago
Assuming ZeroMQ batches messages like other message queue technologies, you're comparing apples to oranges. The article is about receiving 1M network packets per second.
65.
▲
by
davidcuddeback
6y ago
> In a way it is dark matter, as dark matter was the name of the hidden variable in the cosmos responsible for the rest of the gravitational interaction that we see. They're not the same, because the missing baryonic matter doesn&
66.
▲
by
davidcuddeback
6y ago
Thanks for the list. I'll keep these in mind for my next GUI project. I've used Qt a few times for hobby projects, but was thinking about trying something else for my next GUI project.
67.
▲
by
davidcuddeback
6y ago
It’s be helpful to have some concrete examples of where one might run into limits with the minimalist frameworks and why a larger framework is required to overcome those limits.
68.
▲
by
davidcuddeback
6y ago
I had a CS professor in college who required assignments to be submitted with 3-space indentation.
69.
▲
by
davidcuddeback
7y ago
Just because Lindsey Graham said that, doesn't mean Thriptic is agreeing with it.
70.
▲
by
davidcuddeback
7y ago
Heh. That's the argument that was made against using Rails' `try()` method at my last place of work. Made me laugh. Thanks. :)
71.
▲
by
davidcuddeback
7y ago
It doesn’t tell me which or his opinions he thinks are backed up by accepted definitions or what he considers an accepted definition. So no, it doesn’t tell us anything. It sounds more like a weasel word to get out of providing citations to
72.
▲
by
davidcuddeback
7y ago
> cannot be compared line-by-line to a text book definition of open source Why not? The OP claims that his opinions are explicitly mentioned in accepted definitions: > some of which are explicit in accepted definitions of the term
73.
▲
by
davidcuddeback
7y ago
>> The second is that if you advertise something as Open Source, there is a common set of assumptions about what that means, some of which are explicit in accepted definitions of the term. > It seems the "common set of assu
74.
▲
by
davidcuddeback
7y ago
> writing Rust like it is X year Are you reacting to the talk about "editions," e.g., Rust 2015 and Rust 2018? Those are actual concepts in Rust, similar to how C has C89, C99, and C11. I personally don't feel compelled
75.
▲
by
davidcuddeback
7y ago
Thanks. Didn't know about the raw identifier syntax. That's kinda ugly, so I'd probably still go with copying it to all of my projects and giving it a new name if I were to update to Rust 2018.
76.
▲
by
davidcuddeback
7y ago
> Did something happen to make that not compile? `try` became a reserved keyword in Rust 2018 and the `try!()` macro was dropped (edit: not dropped, see @boardwaalk's comment). I could copy the old macro to all of my code bases an
77.
▲
by
davidcuddeback
7y ago
> Can't the changing fashions in what's idiomatic be ignored? They absolutely can, but you might be stuck on an older "edition" of Rust. I've stuck with `try!()` for error-handling, because I think error-handli
78.
▲
by
davidcuddeback
7y ago
> last-femtocentury You nerd-sniped me. I couldn't resist calculating it. A femtocentury is about 3.16 microseconds.
79.
▲
by
davidcuddeback
7y ago
> Sorry, we don't need more Chinese shit. The virus was enough. Xenophobia is not okay.
80.
▲
by
davidcuddeback
7y ago
That’s a good use case for monitoring tools. There’s a Munin plugin that will measure days until expiration for SSL certs. I use that with an alert threshold just shorter than when Let’s Encrypt auto renews so that I get an email alert in c
81.
▲
by
davidcuddeback
7y ago
> it's not going to be on the necessary track for a degree Compilers was a required 2-class series for my CS degree.
82.
▲
by
davidcuddeback
7y ago
It sounds a lot like God of the gaps [1], only with aliens instead of God. [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_of_the_gaps
83.
▲
by
davidcuddeback
7y ago
>> information wants to be free > Whomever said that was probably thinking of facts, of knowledge, s/he was probably not thinking of having opinions about pedophiles. John Stuart Mill is probably rolling over in his grave
84.
▲
by
davidcuddeback
7y ago
That would make sense if science was a monoculture and could only be challenged from the outside, but scientists question each others' findings all the time. You can't have a scientific process without scrutiny.
85.
▲
by
davidcuddeback
7y ago
The orbit didn't physically change. The author fixed his code and reran the analysis.
86.
▲
by
davidcuddeback
7y ago
Eccentricity describes the shape of an orbit. 0 is perfectly circular. Between 0 and 1 is elliptical. 1 is parabolic. Above 1 is hyperbolic. So an eccentricity of 3.0 is hyperbolic, which means the object is of interstellar origin. (Picture
87.
▲
by
davidcuddeback
7y ago
Update: eccentricity closer to 3.0 (still hyperbolic). https://twitter.com/AscendingNode/status/1171845027099795456
88.
▲
by
davidcuddeback
7y ago
This is pretty much my experience, too, almost word-for-word. I also run OpenBSD on my edge nodes and FreeBSD for most app servers. After using FreeBSD on servers for about two years, I felt more comfortable with it than I do with Linux aft
89.
▲
by
davidcuddeback
7y ago
There’s also malloc_conceal() and calloc_conceal(), as discussed in the article.
90.
▲
by
davidcuddeback
7y ago
> In composition (and its on-steroid cousin, delegation), the component/delegate can't "call back" into the aggregating object. It can if you design it to take a pointer to the aggregating object. Pass this or se
More ›