3 ms·
> cannot be compared line-by-line to a text book definition of open source Why not? The OP claims that his opinions are explicitly mentioned in accepted defini
by davidcuddeback 7y ago
> cannot be compared line-by-line to a text book definition of open source
Why not? The OP claims that his opinions are explicitly mentioned in accepted definitions:
> some of which are explicit in accepted definitions of the term
If the OP is going to make that claim, why should we not expect to be able to find validation for his assumptions in a written definition of open source?
- Talanes 7y agoThe fact that your quote starts with the word "some" should tell you everything you need to know.
- davidcuddeback 7y agoIt doesn’t tell me which or his opinions he thinks are backed up by accepted definitions or what he considers an accepted definition. So no, it doesn’t tell us anything. It sounds more like a weasel word to get out of providing citations to back up his arguments.