davidcrowe

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by davidcrowe 4mo ago

   Yea, they removed the fork <24 hours after I reported it
2. 2.▲
   by davidcrowe 4mo ago

   Same thing happened to one of my repos in Feb. I wrote up the details with screenshots. https://reducibl.com/writing/someone-used-my-repo-to-distrib...
3. 3.▲
   Show HN: ACP – Governance for AI Coding Agents (Claude Code, OpenClaw)(agenticcontrolplane.com)

   1 points by davidcrowe 6mo ago|0 comments
4. 4.▲
   by davidcrowe 8mo ago

   The difference is that MCP introduces a third party: the agent isn't the user and isn't the service, but it's acting on behalf of one to call the other. Standard HTTP auth assumes two parties. That's the gap the spec nee
5. 5.▲
   Show HN: GatewayStack – Deny-by-default security for OpenClaw tool calls(github.com)

   1 points by davidcrowe 8mo ago|0 comments
6. 6.▲
   Someone forked my AI governance repo to distribute malware(reducibl.com)

   1 points by davidcrowe 8mo ago|0 comments
7. 7.▲
   The three-party identity problem in MCP servers(reducibl.com)

   1 points by davidcrowe 10mo ago|0 comments