datadeft

30 ms·

361.
by datadeft 3y ago
You are missing ~70% of the tools functionality.
362.
by datadeft 3y ago
Do you have a detailed article about this? I am trying to set up something like you mentioned
363.
by datadeft 3y ago
Elixir and Explorer using the Rust implementation of Polars under the hood is practically the same as Python and the Polars Python bindings. The rest of the programming language makes a difference though. Python rejected a large portion of
364.
by datadeft 3y ago
I just implemented a trading system in Elixir with backend + JS free frontend and I have to admit that this was the most pleasant experience for a long time. I think pattern matching and the pipe operator combined with the let it crash appr
365.
by datadeft 3y ago
I guess it is milliseconds based on the names and the results later in the article. - time-to-first-execution (TTFX) - time-to-load (TTL)
366.
by datadeft 3y ago
> being spent on quasi-useless "improvements" i am not a new kid on the block either but I was looking for such a tool for a very long time. I think distributed shell history across all of my servers is a big win.
367.
by datadeft 3y ago
I see two major differences: - how active the development is[1] - having a distributed option (McFly does not have one) 1. Seeking co-maintainers: I don't have much time to maintain this project these days. If someone would like to jum
368.
by datadeft 3y ago
Because it is webscale.
369.
by datadeft 3y ago
AD company furious about government regulation removing data access that AD revenue depends on.
370.
by datadeft 3y ago
Memory and computing power Memory is the principal lever available to Lambda developers for controlling the performance of a function. You can configure the amount of memory allocated to a Lambda function, between 128 MB and 10,240 MB. The
371.
by datadeft 3y ago
How does this compare to Erlang/Elixir? Is any gain of using a strictly typed language or the benefits are mostly related to Rust's CPU efficiency?
372.
by datadeft 3y ago
I finally realised after using Lambda for almost a decade (started to use it when it was released 9 years ago) that instead of think about apps that you map to lambda functions you should think about features instead. A simple example: I ha
373.
by datadeft 3y ago
GECKO all the way. :) I think AWS gave a reasonable price to Retail. The migration caused the biggest outage of the website but at the end there was some pretty nice cost saving on the YOY infra cost.
374.
by datadeft 3y ago
All of things you are complaining about are well known facts that are clearly stated in the documentation. I don't care about what is the equivalent computing power in 90s desktop measurement because you cannot replace a lambda functio
375.
by datadeft 3y ago
Microservices make sense for a lot more than 5%. If fact I think it is much closer to the 80/20, 80% working on serverless, 20% not. Video streaming obviously not going to work on AWS Lambda to begin with.
376.
by datadeft 3y ago
Why would that be? Somebody figured out that AWS Lambda is not the answer to every single question?
377.
by datadeft 3y ago
It is possible[1]. You are better off this way than the AWS "native" way. 1. https://dev.l1x.be/posts/2023/02/28/using-python-3.11-with-a...
378.
by datadeft 3y ago
Exactly right. Most cloud victims are people who have faith instead of cost calculations. DHH & co. are the prime example. It seems even Amazon has such people. I guess hiring is much harder nowadays.
379.
by datadeft 3y ago
Two things: - When people use the solution -> problem path instead of problem -> proposals -> cost analysis -> solution they get what they deserve. - It is possible to optimize most infrastructures and code, it depends how much
380.
by datadeft 3y ago
> Microsoft needs to think hard how hostile they want to be to its competitors The last 30 years of MS shows that they are not interested in the non-hostile approach Few things: - Microsoft Java Virtual Machine scandal - https:/&#x
381.
by datadeft 3y ago
It was not designed to those things and there are many other languages that are way better in many aspects of software engineering than Python ever will be with type checks and other relatively minor improvements. I consider Python as the l
382.
by datadeft 3y ago
Does this mean I have to potentially deal with two vendors when there is an outage? Awesome!
383.
by datadeft 3y ago
> RISC-V is taking over the world Citation needed. Apple is the most successful ARM platform as of now. Everything else is minor compare to them. I would really like to see that we have RISC-V as an alternative platform but right now it
384.
by datadeft 3y ago
Sorry one of the key part of deploying web applications is not part of the offering.
385.
Windows ARM Dev Kit 2023(microsoft.com)
57 points by datadeft 3y ago|49 comments
386.
by datadeft 3y ago
Are you familiar with the concept of no-2.0 for Rust? The do this on purpose so the users (the software engineers) never need to convert a version x project to a version y unlike for example Python (2 -> 3). I think this is amazing.
387.
by datadeft 3y ago
Didn't take too long to start the 2.0 version. I really like how Rust does not do this.
388.
by datadeft 3y ago
Like D2? I love it. https://play.d2lang.com/
389.
by datadeft 3y ago
Quality went a bit down since White Russian.
390.
by datadeft 3y ago
I seriously interested: what would happen if Firefox did allow fingerprinting using random() and it would generate a new fingerprint for each tab. Would it violate anything?

More ›