Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dartos
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
17 ms
·
211.
▲
by
dartos
2y ago
any phishing email could just directly link to a fake Google login form. Oauth just adds extra steps for the attacker.
212.
▲
by
dartos
2y ago
> I’m not giving myself any kind of independent treatment based on the output of an LLM. But it provides possibilities that doctors may have overlooked. You might not, but others would. I mean people take random advice from the internet
213.
▲
by
dartos
2y ago
> Is that not a significant issue? No more an issue than normal. I don’t see how oauth makes it easier to phish. The attacker would need to have a fake or compromised site send the victim to another fake site.
214.
▲
by
dartos
2y ago
Rust, IMO is a noisy language. So not surprising it took more lines. Having to handle every case of every branch also probably balloons line count. Efficient LOC is not a goal of rust at all anyway.
215.
▲
by
dartos
2y ago
Depends who was in the meeting.
216.
▲
by
dartos
2y ago
So glad most people in the “real world” are experts in health an epidemiology. Taking the same stance as most people has never been wrong.
217.
▲
by
dartos
2y ago
Did you reply to the wrong comment? I don’t see the connection, sorry.
218.
▲
by
dartos
2y ago
I think the root issue is that the word “love” in English has far too many meanings. When you “love” a company, it’s not the same as “loving” your wife. And “loving” your wife is different, still, than “loving” your brother or best friend.
219.
▲
by
dartos
2y ago
Same here.
220.
▲
by
dartos
2y ago
> I think parent comment is suggesting it's dangerous for you to publicly tell others that ChatGPT is better than their doctor at diagnosing them (however little of your doctor's attention you get) regardless of whether there i
221.
▲
by
dartos
2y ago
OC started their comment with > Unpopular take: ChatGPT is better at diagnosing medical problems than a doctor who does a cursory evaluation. Which is dangerous and harmful advice. No reason to muddy the waters.
222.
▲
by
dartos
2y ago
I don’t live in a large city. I’d bet that, if you live in the US, there are options for doctors within a 1-2 hour drive from you. I drive an hour and a half to see an independent dentist I trust. I’m lucky enough to have a decent doctor on
223.
▲
by
dartos
2y ago
It’s not just unpopular, it’s dangerous. Please people, for the love of life and health, don’t trust your medical issues to LLMs. You’re lucky it was just mono. Maybe find a better doctor if you feel you’re not getting good enough care…
224.
▲
by
dartos
2y ago
I’d suggest changing that name. In a world where tech layoffs are super common “Stack Ranking” has an extremely negative connotation.
225.
▲
by
dartos
2y ago
Every day it becomes clearer and clearer that LLMs are, mainly, a huge step forward in search algorithms.
226.
▲
by
dartos
2y ago
Would you want to be reliant on American companies right now?
227.
▲
by
dartos
2y ago
I’m not saying every C compiler is always perfectly predictable, but by virtue of it being a simpler language it should Always be more predictable than rust, barring arcane optimizations. I do agree that if someone actually cares about the
228.
▲
by
dartos
2y ago
Is the elixir+erlang ecosystem less stable than clojure’s
229.
▲
by
dartos
2y ago
> Projects are a lot harder when trips to the hardware store take months rather than days How long do you think it takes to plan a trip to the moon? > I think Starship makes colonies a whole lot more viable Why?
230.
▲
by
dartos
2y ago
Two reasons I can think of off the top of my head. The assembly outputted from C compilers tend to be more predictable by virtue of C being a simpler language. This matters when writing drivers for exotic hardware. Sometimes to do things li
231.
▲
by
dartos
2y ago
No idea, but my gut says obviously.
232.
▲
by
dartos
2y ago
Uhh > The problem is AI current best use case is creative work, art, music, programming By “best” do you mean “marketable?” Seems weird to see a bunch of creatives and creative professionals “disdain” a tool and still say it’s “best” for
233.
▲
by
dartos
2y ago
That’s a good point. It’d be one of the few truths he publicly states.
234.
▲
by
dartos
2y ago
> true advancement is always energy management Idk about that, but yeah I agree AI has got a good 3-5 years left in its hype run.
235.
▲
by
dartos
2y ago
I remember when all PCs were going to be little hdmi devices which would stream a VM do any device you plug it in to.
236.
▲
by
dartos
2y ago
Yes there is a better way to develop tech without knowingly sending a group of people to their deaths. We could throw 100s of billions of dollars into it. But it’s harder to sell to investors than language models
237.
▲
by
dartos
2y ago
Tbf LLMs are pretty incredible accessibility tools. Speech to text using whisper is almost perfect. I once worked with someone who wasn’t fluent in English, but could read it really well. He had whisper running during meetings because he co
238.
▲
by
dartos
2y ago
No, the whole point of apps is data collection, background tasks (when the device is closed) and push notifications.
239.
▲
by
dartos
2y ago
At this point I’d settle for the party that at least pretends to follow the rules they make. It’s better for my mental
240.
▲
by
dartos
2y ago
As a functional fan, CLOS is amazing.
More ›