darora

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by darora 14y ago

   No, you're correct in that assumption. In case of a complete server breach, that would indeed allow for de-anonymization of posts.
2. 2.▲
   by darora 14y ago

   The friends' feed (or any other place, for that matter) doesn't show any identities. For "rogue" friends, we have on our roadmap a mechanism to "flag" users for a review of their postings. That'd trigger an admin banning them if necessary
3. 3.▲
   by darora 14y ago

   Well, quite simply, you can anonymously[1] discuss things with your Facebook friends (or the whole world, if you'd like). [1]: That is, apart from the login and pulling in your list of friends so as to populate your "Friends' feed", we don'
4. 4.▲
   by darora 14y ago

   Hmm. I'm beginning to suspect that you're right. We'll be looking into implementing this. Thanks
5. 5.▲
   by darora 14y ago

   To be honest, without the facebook integration of being able to talk to _your friends_, there are-as has been pointed out-far too many anonymous forums already.
6. 6.▲
   by darora 14y ago

   True. Our reasons for using Facebook were twofold- * It enables you to talk to your FB friends--a group whose opinion that you probably care about & respect--anonymously, so that they don't have to hold back or sugarcoat things. * It en
7. 7.▲
   Show HN: Hush, an "incognito mode for Facebook"(hush.sh)

   21 points by darora 14y ago|36 comments