danott

3 ms·

1.
by danott 5y ago
Yes! We have several language-specific models we train against to see which performs the best for your data. Which language (or languages) do you need? (feel free to email me at dan at nyckel dot com)
2.
by danott 5y ago
Thanks for the feedback! We actually had a feature for “what is the accuracy if I only consider >80% confident samples” but we iterated away from it because people found it complicated. We’ll definitely bring it back when we can make i
3.
by danott 5y ago
Actually, all these examples are straight from our userbase. I can't speak to how successful they're being in their own businesses, but they seem happy with the ML. The 'barcodeless scanner' in particular is about scann
4.
by danott 5y ago
Yep. The pricing model does basically break down for model export, but I think there's a solution there. Or, said another way, if we could make it really easy to do then there's an adjacent business we could move into. In terms
5.
by danott 5y ago
Well there’s a continuum of offerings, some having lots of custom control of the training pipeline and on the other side things like CustomVision that try to make it easy / hide the complexity. We consider ourselves even further to th
6.
by danott 5y ago
Oh man, we literally just got new images from our new designer and I think they went a different direction with that one :)
7.
by danott 5y ago
Haha yea I'm to blame for the crappy UI... I believe in principle with shipping things you're uncomfortable with, but it also hurts my soul.
8.
by danott 5y ago
We do think "model export" is important, but we're still getting our heads around how to do it in the most non-ML-expert friendly way. We don't think the persona we're building for wants a weights file dropped in t
9.
by danott 5y ago
Thanks. They're both on the roadmap; in fact we've got a handful of users in a private beta for object detection; let me know if you're interested in getting in on that!