danieltanfh95

4 ms·

1.
by danieltanfh95 14d ago
Man we're going full 2015 ML, telling normies that confidence scores mean NOTHING to alleviate false negatives/positives.
2.
by danieltanfh95 14d ago
> Net, I pay more taxes than a citizen with the same income. No you don't, most foreigners don't pay more taxes overall per lifetime.
3.
by danieltanfh95 15d ago
Academia is in a time for reckoning. Actors who already went through the process (or otherwise) gained sufficient reputation or credentials to self-market their own paper can skip journals entirely. That was what OpenAI did. With a sufficie
4.
by danieltanfh95 1mo ago
it's not just "not sound", it is outright wrong.
5.
by danieltanfh95 1mo ago
> the bots started solving difficulty 5 turning it into a problem of ROI is one of the stupidest things you can do to prevent bots. use https://github.com/danieltanfh95/continuity-auth instead
6.
Show HN: Moba Go – Go with alternating long thinks and rapid bursts(go.danieltan.omg.lol)
1 points by danieltanfh95 2mo ago|1 comments
7.
by danieltanfh95 2mo ago
I wanted to design a game to teach my wife MOBA basics of map control and map-setup so I created this. Blitz go is too fast to think, and normal go squeezes most of the nail-biting fighting near the end. Players play through a setup phase w
8.
Observers in Quantum Field Theory Cannot Be Fundamental Excitations(philpapers.org)
2 points by danieltanfh95 2mo ago|0 comments
9.
by danieltanfh95 2mo ago
Probably good to note that this person is building his own language: https://inko-lang.org/
10.
by danieltanfh95 2mo ago
> NATS control-plane events: stream leader election / R3 quorum re-form during pod churn. this is perfectly understandable?
11.
by danieltanfh95 2mo ago
Why would they waste their time in peer review?
12.
by danieltanfh95 3mo ago
NGL AI usage is driven by friction in presentation and communication over petty details.
13.
by danieltanfh95 3mo ago
> my "cover" here became the discussion itself My "cover" is good because of X, their "cover" is bad because of Y, is not a helpful analogue nor a useful one.
14.
by danieltanfh95 3mo ago
Outsourcing your ability to think to "the community" is pretty much the same as handing it over to AI. AI is trained on the community. Argumentum ad populum.
15.
by danieltanfh95 3mo ago
what do you even mean to "not put a cover" on it, everyone communicates differently. Your comment here puts on a "snide, snarky, trying to be smart but failing" cover that I have discarded because your idea may have some
16.
by danieltanfh95 3mo ago
1. because your belief that AI-generated text is worse than human written text is flat out illogical and wrong. 2. judge content not by its cover and think.
17.
Moonshot AI (kimi) launches a credit card(kimi.com)
4 points by danieltanfh95 3mo ago|1 comments
18.
by danieltanfh95 4mo ago
That's a skill issue, not a technology issue.
19.
by danieltanfh95 4mo ago
> develop your game with offline playability in mind from the beginning > players churn on their own without social features you say one thing but the market votes the other way. Game developers are under pressure to turn a profit. If
20.
by danieltanfh95 4mo ago
wrong, the commission did discuss with SKG, but the entire group had their head in the sand when reasonable people asked SKG to respect technical reality and resubmit a better, reality-focused proposal as SKG 2.0. They ban anyone not in the
21.
by danieltanfh95 4mo ago
you are conflating the idea of "living with something" with the notion of "being alive". You live with your car/computer/phone. Like it or not, they change your life.
22.
by danieltanfh95 4mo ago
This was planned as a submission to the Gravity Research Foundation for 2027. The Dirac Spinor equation is extremely standard, and GR would be the more famous one. The only "leap of faith" here is having the metric to be the funct
23.
Gravity has always been quantum mechanical: it is the wrong thing to quantise(zenodo.org)
4 points by danieltanfh95 4mo ago|4 comments
24.
by danieltanfh95 4mo ago
Thanks for being honest, at least.
25.
by danieltanfh95 4mo ago
> The demand for software most certainly has an upper limit. No, it does not. There is no ceiling for complexity.
26.
by danieltanfh95 4mo ago
This is multiple logical fallacies in one comment and definitely a comment I would mark in the "pure nonsense" bin. Not all criticism is slop, but anything ad hominem (personal attacks), argumentum ad populum (appeal to popularity
27.
by danieltanfh95 4mo ago
Understanding goes both ways. OP was just sharing something they thought was interesting. The Ted Chiang piece was horribly written logically and yet it was "written well" in prose. We should look past the writing and learn (if an
28.
by danieltanfh95 4mo ago
Exploring if it makes sense to use maths (or, to be precise, this particular construction) to drive content addressable content + other exploration around the memory space. IMO, no. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48436
29.
by danieltanfh95 4mo ago
Exploring if it makes sense to use maths (or, to be precise, this particular construction) to drive content addressable content + other exploration around the memory space. IMO, no. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48436
30.
by danieltanfh95 4mo ago
Then why even insinuate that these are similar? It's just using it to heavily suggest it is crankery.

More ›