danielmiller

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by danielmiller 14y ago

   [I can't respond to your comment directly. This is a bit off-topic, but I think it's interesting!! Here goes.] > It is true that "not all men are the same" (and "not all women are the same"), but splitting into "trans male" and "trans
2. 2.▲
   by danielmiller 14y ago

   Agreed! "Male" isn't one homogenous lump of people; neither is "female". And, as you mentioned, neither is "transgender(ed)"[1]. [1]: http://www.paulinepark.com/2011/03/glaad-is-wrong-on-transge...
3. 3.▲
   by danielmiller 14y ago

   If you feel resentful toward your coworkers or are planning on quitting your job soon: You could have Male, Female, and Transgendered tables, each of which point back to the Patient table. Only the Female table (and perhaps the Transgendere
4. 4.▲
   by danielmiller 14y ago

   What mind-mapping software do you use? A quick Google search reveals quite a few apps. I had never heard of this "genre" until now!
5. 5.▲
   by danielmiller 14y ago

   I'd love to have a delightful product, and I'd love for it to be given positive press to over a hundred thousand people! But like Android back in 2008, I don't think I'd get there without scrappily alleviating a pain point, getting my foo
6. 6.▲
   by danielmiller 14y ago

   Hold on a second, Jeff! > Your software, your product, is nothing more than a collection of tiny details. If you don't obsess over all those details, if you think it's OK to concentrate on the "important" parts and continue to ignore t