danielcarver

4 ms·

1.
by danielcarver 8y ago
Oh fuck. I’m totally wrong. I take back what I said. My bad. Thanks for the link. Altman is a boss
2.
by danielcarver 8y ago
UBI needs to be furloughed. UBI aka just a scheme to keep the money flowing from the prole’s wallet into altman’s pocket. Universal basic EQUITY is a different thing. But he’s not offering that.
3.
by danielcarver 8y ago
> In fact, it could be argued that the athletic departments themselves are already serving ss genetically gated dating services for elite genes. Stanford crew girl has a thing for Stanford wide receiver is a lot easier method of getting
4.
by danielcarver 8y ago
I don’t understand this at all. The dude you’re responding to is clearly criticizing sexism rather than reinforcing it. There is absolutely nothing in his comment to suggest that “only women can be cheats.”
5.
by danielcarver 8y ago
This makes absolutely zero sense. Not only is a figure of 40% male reproduction compatible with polygyny, it is solely compatible with polygyny. If humans were monogamous as you suggest, the figure of male reproduction would be far close
6.
by danielcarver 8y ago
You’re incorrect, neither founder of AA was an atheist, they were both hardcore Christians.
7.
by danielcarver 8y ago
AA absolutely is about Christianity, it is an offshoot of Christianity and a Christian organization. The emphasis on public self-flagellation and self-humiliation via drunkalogs and self labeling as “alcoholics” aka sinners, the insistence
8.
by danielcarver 8y ago
So true. I find it hilarious that the same people who want open borders want techies out of the Bay Area. They’re literally arguing for immigration in the form of open borders while simultaneously arguing against it by demanding techies (ak
9.
by danielcarver 8y ago
We can solve the peer validation issue by ceasing to create it in the first place. In the model of human development I and my peers were taught in public school in America, humans start out life as “parent-oriented” people. Then when we go
10.
by danielcarver 8y ago
You are incorrect. There are plenty of people who get their lives together after long periods of “fucking up.” Save yourself a lot of headache by abandoning your delusion that “a fuck-up will always be a fuck-up.”