dangleberry

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by dangleberry 2y ago

   Yes, an utterly backwards law that the people should not be so willing to accept. Thank goodness for steganography.
2. 2.▲
   by dangleberry 2y ago

   > They flipped through their TSA state ID binder and did the customary comparison Wait, what is this? I've never seen anything like that, normally they just check the name on the ID matches the boarding pass. You're saying they
3. 3.▲
   by dangleberry 2y ago

   > I also have a cardiac implant, if they try to tase me I might even end up dead. Aren't tasers certified not to interfere with pacemakers and similar things?
4. 4.▲
   by dangleberry 2y ago

   > in the most plain and obvious Kafkaesque "he did provide the facescan willingly your honor. not once he opted out, which was always an option". Wouldn't that be Orwellian? Which Kafka story did I miss?
5. 5.▲
   by dangleberry 2y ago

   Congress has been taking a long hard look at Clear and might consider their practices and business model to be illegal, as they rightfully should.
6. 6.▲
   by dangleberry 2y ago

   > Yes, when it comes to face scanners at the airport. You’re standing in front of a government camera for a driver’s license or student id and it can (and likely will) take the same image data that the TSA cameras do. This is wrong. The