dang

14 ms·

421.
by dang 3mo ago
Comments moved to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48945241 .
422.
by dang 3mo ago
One user posted a screenshot: https://prnt.sc/UqjcYD3RSQrS Edit: I was just about to credit the user when my internet dropped. The source was here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48945606 - thanks mir
423.
by dang 3mo ago
Comments moved to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48945241 .
424.
by dang 3mo ago
Comments moved to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48945241 .
425.
by dang 3mo ago
Comments moved to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48945241 .
426.
by dang 3mo ago
We've banned this account for repeatedly breaking the site guidelines and ignoring our requests to stop. Please don't create accounts to break HN's rules with.
427.
by dang 3mo ago
That's true, but the tradeoffs may be changing: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
428.
by dang 3mo ago
Can you please not post AI-generated or AI-edited comments to HN? It's not allowed here - see https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html#generated and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47340079
429.
by dang 3mo ago
Related. Others? Vision of the future: Voxatron's high-priced gamble (2013) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11189329 - Feb 2016 (1 comment) The Humble Voxatron Debut - https://news.ycombinator.com
430.
by dang 3mo ago
Could you please omit swipes like "this is such bullshit" and flamebait like "driving their death machines into kids"? These things are against the site guidelines because they poison the kind of discussion we're tr
431.
by dang 3mo ago
I wish!
432.
by dang 3mo ago
That may well be true. Distinguishing "satire of genai" from "generic genai" is bound to be a hard problem.
433.
by dang 3mo ago
> I linked to a discussion thread linking to the other post. Where? > and you're turning a blind eye to it I spent over an hour taking seriously, looking into, and responding to the concern you raised, only to be accused of &quot
434.
by dang 3mo ago
Responding to a moderation comment with a hostile ("too much knowledge?") accusation about something entirely different is generally a poor way to react. If you have a separate question, that's fine, but firing back with it i
435.
by dang 3mo ago
This is so absurd that I can hardly spell out how absurd it is. (1) You didn't link to those two posts, only one of them ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48900528 ). Now you're complaining that I "still h
436.
by dang 3mo ago
(We detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48903808 . TFR is explained there now.)
437.
by dang 3mo ago
I've taken the liberty of adding a macroexpansion to your post above, and detaching this off topic subthread. I hpoe that's ok!
438.
by dang 3mo ago
We've replaced the title above with a representative phrase from the article.
439.
by dang 3mo ago
(I took the title from the Economist interview since "A Framework for Frontier AI and the Dawning of a New Age" sounds like a press release - https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&sor
440.
by dang 3mo ago
" Eschew flamebait. Avoid generic tangents. " https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
441.
by dang 3mo ago
Your account is fine - nothing changed. Most probably you're just expecting vouch links where there aren't any. (They only show up on posts that are [dead].)
442.
by dang 3mo ago
You haven't supplied any links of that kind. Where are these accounts that are "literally posting the same word-for-word replies"? We need something objective to go on ( https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&
443.
by dang 3mo ago
We banned that account a long time ago, but having taken a quick look I see no reason why you would call that a state propaganda account, other than (1) it expressed strong views that you strongly disagree with, and (2) that always makes a
444.
by dang 3mo ago
Links? I'd like to see examples of the posts and accounts you have in mind.
445.
by dang 3mo ago
That would just supply ammunition to the kind of users who like to go after other users. We want to discourage that, not encourage it. Also, votes and flags are personal, even intimate data. I can't imagine publishing it.
446.
by dang 3mo ago
I can understand why it had that effect on you but these are effects it's necessary to resist. From https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html , for example: " Please respond to the strongest plausible interp
447.
by dang 3mo ago
It always feels like the mods are against you, and it always feels like others are doing worse. These are fixtures of internet forum psychology and you are far from the only one who feels that way. https://hn.algolia.com/?da
448.
by dang 3mo ago
Weird - it was there and then went away. It's back now. Thanks!
449.
by dang 3mo ago
A few reasons I guess: (1) it adds complexity; (2) it has always been HN's design to show the same site to everyone rather than shard; (3) there's a quality of pre-digestion about it which conflicts with the principle of curiosity
450.
by dang 3mo ago
Thanks! Comments merged thither. See also this related ongoing thread: Grok CLI uploaded the whole home directory to GCS - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48892468

More ›