dandesim

5 ms·

1.
by dandesim 1y ago
He's blatantly ignoring that most affiliate programs only payout to the last-click. Okay...great...the first click attribution is maintained, but if there is no payout for it, then the core issue is still the issue.
2.
by dandesim 2y ago
Just like many of these schemes, the first person to do it will probably make a good amount of money, but every nth person after that will make much less. There has always been a large group of people trying to spam their way through the Me
3.
by dandesim 2y ago
The policy is enforceable through moderation. They're probably looking for multiple indicators then doing a manual review. The only way to monetize Medium is through the partner program, which is reliant on high volume of posts or a po
4.
by dandesim 3y ago
There is a difference between aptitude (intelligence) and academic success (grades). There is also the underlying issue of equity. If someone with a high aptitude but low academic performance is put into a situation where they have more acc
5.
by dandesim 3y ago
So how is it worse than what happens now? These tests are worth a lot to a very small subset of people. The average high schooler (even the bottom 85%+) does not have access to those resources
6.
by dandesim 3y ago
That’s just straight false, or at least I have never seen any evidence showing a strong correlation. What has been shown is the negative advantage minorities, impoverished, ESL, disabled people have when taking the test and the advantages t
7.
by dandesim 3y ago
It’s worth a lot to a small subset of people, but that’s an issue today. The biggest way the group you’re referring to cheats will not be made worse by having the system online (bribe proctors, have someone else take the test, SAT training,
8.
by dandesim 3y ago
1. if you can figure out how to do this, you're intelligent enough to score in the top 90th percentile on the exam. 2. good luck getting away with this in person at the proctored exam.
9.
by dandesim 3y ago
This are big statements to be making with no rationale. These will still be proctored exams in person, so there is no reason to believe that cheating will increase . Additionally, there is low indicators from the start that standardized tes
10.
by dandesim 3y ago
First, you're lumping every economist into a single entity. Different economists can look at the same information and determine different outcomes. It is more subjective than objective. That said, many economists did warn that stimulus
11.
by dandesim 3y ago
Consumption - They are people who will buy things. They will also add labor to the market, making goods less expensive for others to purchase. Government Spending - Investment in industries like energy, infrastructure, and chip manufacturin
12.
by dandesim 3y ago
Apple does JIT assembly, so it would be relatively 'easy' to release a new/factory OS version that has this feature disabled. Take the marketing of this feature down, or mark it as in development, and should be okay? I don&#x
13.
by dandesim 3y ago
6.9 million accounts had information stolen because they were "relatives" of 14,000 users? Something doesn't add up there. That would mean each of those random users had 492 "relatives" on the platform. I've ne
14.
by dandesim 3y ago
It's very much more than supporting 'one product'. Off the top of my head, regarding engineering, I can think of: 1. iOS App 2. Android App 3. Windows App 4. Microsoft App 5. Web App 6. Underlying API 7. Artist Portal/Ap