danceonfire

7 ms·

1.
by danceonfire 12y ago
> 536931d80decb18c33db9612bdd004d4 susi Poor women called Susi.
2.
by danceonfire 12y ago
Striped? What about checkered? http://jsfiddle.net/F3KAc/5/
3.
by danceonfire 13y ago
Some of their demos run really bad on my machine. If they cracked the problem, they aren't showing it yet.
4.
by danceonfire 13y ago
That is exactly why my parent and I are correcting the title based on the content.
5.
by danceonfire 13y ago
It's about interviewing Frontend _Web_ Developers. I don't think someone who cannot write JavaScript can call himself a Frontend Web Developer.
6.
by danceonfire 13y ago
I don't get what this is all about. The title was (most probably) derived from Code Golf, which is a competition in coding something with as few characers as possible. Code Golf was derived from Golf, where you want to use as few turns
7.
by danceonfire 13y ago
The goal in code golf is lower character count, not lower score - which is also the case here.
8.
by danceonfire 13y ago
This was already discussed at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6468617 a week ago.
9.
by danceonfire 13y ago
I do, but I still do not see a use case for me. When I'm on the go, I am almost always listening to music.
10.
by danceonfire 13y ago
I wonder if people that are interested in only the App to have their Headphones buttons remapped comfortably will be able to acquire that, and for what price. Not that I have done any research on Apps that already do that, since as I said,
11.
by danceonfire 13y ago
Exactly my thought, too. > You can still use it if you have a pair of headphones in too, with the cans' play button subbing in for control. Sadly, my headphones do not have a button, and I wont be on the go without them, so sadly Pr
12.
by danceonfire 13y ago
> ... where players volunteered to tested the patch to ensure that there were game-breaking exploits ... Is this an error? :) Although I assume the players would very well enjoy game-breaking exploits, as long as they are to their advan
13.
by danceonfire 13y ago
No. The long scale of 420,081,335,014 would be 420 milliards, short scale being 420 billion.