danabo

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by danabo 5y ago

   The book in question is called "The Disc Embedding Theorem" ( https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-disc-embedding-t... )
2. 2.▲
   by danabo 6y ago

   This is in response to the trending list of fallacies: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25967160
3. 3.▲
   List of Fallacies (Wikipedia)(en.wikipedia.org)

   28 points by danabo 6y ago|3 comments
4. 4.▲
   by danabo 6y ago

   I agree that the book links are sketchy, though it's not clear if the authors are affiliated with this site. You can always fall back to Wikipedia's extensive list of fallacies: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L
5. 5.▲
   by danabo 6y ago

   It sounds like you are arguing that i.i.d. frequentism doesn't work. I view AIT as generalizing frequentism to non-i.i.d. timeseries. This is formalized as Martin-Lof tests for randomness, and Solomonoff induction.
6. 6.▲
   Primer to Probability Theory and Its Philosophy(zhat.io)

   10 points by danabo 6y ago|0 comments