daishi55

6 ms·

61.
by daishi55 2mo ago
No actually it made a few specific historical analogies that I’ve never heard before and that absolutely could be responded to. The responder just chose not to.
62.
by daishi55 2mo ago
I don’t understand the impulse to whine and complain about the aesthetics of a big company. > a little more cringey and clique Why on earth do I care if someone thinks Cloudflare is cringe? What is interesting about that? They are follow
63.
by daishi55 2mo ago
Nothing they said demonstrated any understanding of what they replied to. They simply restated their opinion with no reference to any of the points made in the comment they were ostensibly replying to.
64.
by daishi55 2mo ago
You don’t seem to have read the comment you are replying to.
65.
by daishi55 2mo ago
This is really a theoretical problem and not a practical one though. Practically, for everything I use these tools for today (complex low-level systems programming), hallucinations don’t even exist anymore. When they don’t know something, t
66.
by daishi55 2mo ago
I mean they have been solved practically I think. I use these things all day every day and haven’t seen a hallucination in a long time.
67.
by daishi55 2mo ago
> I'm just linking charts and figures It’s adorable that you think charts and figures can’t be biased or malicious. > handwaving about future robot armies Yeah and you would’ve said the same thing about China’s EVs, solar panel
68.
by daishi55 2mo ago
Are there any reproducible hallucinations on any of the currently available OAI/Anthropic models? I’m not aware of any. And even if they are related - if Opus 4.8 always has a 1:100 chance of a specific hallucination - then running the
69.
by daishi55 2mo ago
Not really. Take hallucinations for example. If they are 1 in 100 (actually they are much rarer, but for the sake of argument), then the chances that 2 LLMs or even just 2 runs of the same LLM have the same hallucination is, well, a lot les
70.
by daishi55 2mo ago
> In the real world, a supplier can contract to supply more units than they can actually produce. Did this actually happen though? Is there any evidence or you are just imagining a scenario which if it did happen could lead to the scenar
71.
by daishi55 2mo ago
lol… you don’t know anything about the Chinese government if you think they aren’t already preparing for this. And the difference between them and us is that when they prepare for something, they actually prepare for it with real state capa
72.
by daishi55 2mo ago
Yes, I guess we will find out if high demand for their products is good or bad for an industry.
73.
by daishi55 2mo ago
None of this suggests to me that enormous demand for semiconductors could be bad for the semiconductor industry.
74.
by daishi55 2mo ago
I don’t understand how there being essentially unlimited demand for their products that far exceeds supply and is driving up prices accordingly is somehow a bad sign for the industry? > Now, you could raise prices to the point where you
75.
by daishi55 2mo ago
I wanted some examples they actually experienced. Because I use these things daily and haven’t seen a hallucination in a long long time.
76.
by daishi55 2mo ago
That is fkin wild. o3 was just a year ago? The progress is truly insane.
77.
by daishi55 2mo ago
> out of 100 random questions I might think to ask, it’s likely to say something wrong or stupid a handful of times at least. What are some examples?
78.
by daishi55 2mo ago
Yeah what these guys are mainly known for is vaporware > we have pioneered massive scale computing and led the creation of critical infrastructure, products, and foundational AI advances that the world relies on, including multiple gener
79.
by daishi55 2mo ago
Yes it is lol
80.
by daishi55 2mo ago
lol
81.
by daishi55 2mo ago
No, I’m not sure where you are getting the idea that I agree with what I am referring to as cliches last relevant in 2024.
82.
by daishi55 2mo ago
Dislikes AI so much and ironically wrote a whole article without doing any of their own thinking.
83.
by daishi55 2mo ago
If the author can’t put in the effort to think of something original to say that hasn’t been said 1000x, why should I put the effort into rebutting cliches that were last relevant in 2024?
84.
by daishi55 2mo ago
> “Agentic workflow” (or whatever they’re calling it at the time you’re reading this article) > Unlike the silver bullets of the past (like microservices or NoSQL) > Hallucinations are an inherent property of how LLMs work. > I
85.
by daishi55 2mo ago
Yes? My point is that for what I do - low level systems and embedded stuff - nestJS is really not something that I need or want to know about. I just want a good dashboard. Now thanks to LLMs, I can focus on the fun and interesting stuff.
86.
by daishi55 2mo ago
> All the boring stuff you skipped to get right to the answer you want was just as important This is obviously not the case. There are mountains and mountains of boring, unimportant stuff that LLMs can do for us now. For example, at work
87.
by daishi55 2mo ago
Yes, I noticed that was her title and not the submitters title so I edited my comment accordingly.
88.
by daishi55 2mo ago
Not really a rant? She’s just clarifying a reasonable difference between different types of technology to explain how her work qualifies as science fiction without being all about what she calls “hi-tech” technology. Sounded pretty reasonab
89.
by daishi55 3mo ago
To what end though? If you want financial freedom, and you’re smart, you’re likely to be much better off just working in big tech vs trying and almost certainly failing to successfully found a company. Of course some people win the lottery,
90.
by daishi55 3mo ago
I don’t trust anyone who has the general, abstract goal of being a “founder”. If there’s no great idea to go with it, it just seems like vanity. And sure it does work out really well anyway sometimes, but it’s just something I can’t get beh

More ›