dageshi

43 ms·

571.
by dageshi 5y ago
With DN'ing most just get rid of the majority of their stuff before they go. That one really isn't that difficult.
572.
by dageshi 5y ago
There's a good time team on Salisbury Cathedral that's worth a watch, sadly the quality of the uploaded version is only 360p https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=so8WBdhsUnw
573.
by dageshi 5y ago
You either tether yourself to a companies whim or you tether yourself to piles of physical stuff you have to manage for the rest of your life. Personally I'll take digital every time the choice comes up.
574.
by dageshi 5y ago
I broadly agree, with vaccines I don't really think there's a good reason to keep schools closed. Before I think it made sense to err on the side of caution.
575.
by dageshi 5y ago
The main issue with schools is that the kids catch it, don't suffer with it much but pass it to their parents and potentially grand parents. Schools are just a great nexuses for rapidly spreading covid through communities.
576.
by dageshi 5y ago
No, viewing the posts of the person with 50k+ followers is worth something, the dribs and drabs are just the cost of business.
577.
by dageshi 5y ago
Will anyone pay me for this comment? I'm guessing not. Will anyone pay for yours? Also probably not. Because in both cases they take minutes or less to write. 99.999% of most content on most social media is equivalent to this, what is
578.
by dageshi 5y ago
That's not even remotely true. If you're sufficiently big enough on social media you can get your own advertising deals directly with advertisers and cut out the platform itself. If you're small enough that you can't do
579.
by dageshi 5y ago
Doesn't that only really work if you like the current society and it's direction? If you don't, why would you support it with effort you don't need to expend?
580.
by dageshi 5y ago
The lesson of the internet is that lower friction always wins. If people had charged for everything on the internet from its inception, it would have died. I'd rather have good than perfect, I think the internet is pretty good at the m
581.
by dageshi 5y ago
I think it's a case of most people have a finite amount of really productive time in them per day and once it's exhausted trying to squeeze more out is counter productive. What do you fill the rest of the time with? If you accept
582.
by dageshi 5y ago
Then you can certainly carry your desktop around with you? Since these things are negligible.
583.
by dageshi 5y ago
Personally I very rarely re-read books so the concept of owning them just doesn't really matter to me. If my ebook collection suddenly disappeared I wouldn't particularly care, I already got the value out of them I was going to ge
584.
by dageshi 5y ago
If the energy is basically free which under certain circumstances (lots of wind) could happen, does it matter how inefficient it is?
585.
by dageshi 5y ago
Google won't rank them low because they actually do serve an important purpose. They're there for people who don't really know what they want specifically, they're looking for an overview. A top 10 gives a digestible ove
586.
by dageshi 5y ago
I don't think it'll ever happen until massive new fab capacity comes online at this point.
587.
by dageshi 5y ago
I think the other reason, besides micotransactions being more profitable, is it's just a better business model for most companies. Having a reasonably predictable regular income is preferable to a one off hit or miss of a single player
588.
by dageshi 5y ago
I don't know if mobile cores factor into the same process, but if you have a lot of demand for 2 core system for cheap laptops that can't supply the power or cooling for a 4 core then having more 4 cores, even if they're chea
589.
by dageshi 5y ago
UK UKpol is not far off nowadays either, that one didn't used to be so terrible. Never really read AskUK but I don't doubt it's similar. The only way forward is to keep it casual.
590.
by dageshi 5y ago
Only masochists go near that sub, it's pretty much the most miserable place on the entire internet.
591.
by dageshi 5y ago
I might be wrong, but I thought he was factoring in all the equipment he bought in that first year in that calculation? So next year you wouldn't have that cost.
592.
by dageshi 5y ago
Probably because raising money would be harder, would investors or venture firms weigh projects in industries likely to be nationalised lower? Probably. Any industry likely to be nationalised would have an overall depressive effect on the n
593.
by dageshi 5y ago
If you're an entrepreneur why would you attempt anything in any industry likely to be nationalised?
594.
by dageshi 5y ago
I have often thought the BBC ought to create individual youtube channels for their tv series and put teasers for new episodes as they release on iplayer, along with the most popular clips from those shows. An audience of young people who al
595.
by dageshi 5y ago
Would that be true in 10 years time when Netflix has been churning out content at its current rate and cost?
596.
by dageshi 5y ago
I think there's competing issues here, there's an aspect of "I want to prove myself" by creating something really good and unique that I can be proud of. There's also the "do good" aspect of potentially cr
597.
by dageshi 5y ago
Slow release variants are the ones I go for jet lag. 2.5mg slow release melatonin usually does the job. If you wake up it kicks in again enough for you to fall asleep relatively quickly.
598.
by dageshi 5y ago
None of that is anti-competitive? It's just business?
599.
by dageshi 5y ago
I don't think so. 99.9% of people don't need or want to do anything beyond what iPhone/Android currently offers, I would put money on the fact that a majority of iphone buyers are completely happy with things as they are.
600.
by dageshi 5y ago
It's interesting to me, I've never bought a single crypto thing of any type but I look at the speed it's developing and popularity and it reminds me of the internet circa early 2000's when things were moving fast. The in

More ›