dabernathy89

12 ms·

91.
Who Is Exploding Stuff?(github.community)
2 points by dabernathy89 6y ago|0 comments
92.
by dabernathy89 6y ago
So happy I went down the Vue-route from the beginning. Could I learn and understand hooks really well if I wanted to? Sure. But with Vue lifecycle hooks - and with the upcoming Vue 3 composition API - I don't have to overthink anything
93.
by dabernathy89 6y ago
It's explicitly advertised for that purpose ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
94.
by dabernathy89 6y ago
I used one on my 2015 MBP for years. It appears that the newer MBP models (and perhaps the Air as well) are built differently. Also, to be fair, the webcam cover I used was metal (I didn't realize that when I bought it).
95.
by dabernathy89 6y ago
This is new guidance, which I'm glad they issued. These kinds of covers worked on previous MBP models with no trouble, though.
96.
by dabernathy89 6y ago
I also used one on a 15" MBP (albeit 2015 model) for a long time with no trouble. I don't recall closing the lid particularly hard when it broke, though I may have.
97.
by dabernathy89 6y ago
Here you go. https://twitter.com/dabernathy89/status/1257350535440748547 Edit: Also, from my limited research, the repair cost w/out AppleCare+ (or regular AppleCare if they don't count it as accidental
98.
by dabernathy89 6y ago
Don't even use the extremely thin ones unless you have AppleCare+. Not worth the risk of a $1,000 repair. This one destroyed my screen completely: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07C24NBGL/ref=cm_sw_r_sms_apa_i_T..
99.
by dabernathy89 6y ago
This is the one that destroyed the screen on my 16" MBP. 0.023 inches thick. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07C24NBGL/ref=cm_sw_r_sms_apa_i_T...
100.
by dabernathy89 6y ago
I hope you have AppleCare+!
101.
by dabernathy89 6y ago
It does not have to be a bulky cover. I used an extremely low profile webcam cover on my 2015 MBP for 3 years. I put a similar one on my 16" MBP, and it destroyed the screen after a couple weeks. Specifically, this is the webcam cove
102.
by dabernathy89 6y ago
Yep. https://twitter.com/dabernathy89/status/1257341572267548673 https://twitter.com/dabernathy89/status/1257350535440748547
103.
by dabernathy89 6y ago
This is a related and surprisingly fascinating article about the cast of characters involved in many of the missteps of the Green Collection (which became the Museum of the Bible): https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/a
104.
by dabernathy89 7y ago
Yep, we had a PIN in place before and it did no good, because the transfer is initiated from outside of Verizon - and for some reason Verizon just allows it (without the enhanced security). We were told that Verizon's enhanced security
105.
by dabernathy89 7y ago
This is the recommended solution: > The easiest way to make it impossible for SIM swappers to take over your accounts after they hijack your number is to unlink your phone number with those accounts, and use a VoIP number—such as Google
106.
by dabernathy89 7y ago
Yes, you can add additional security onto your account - at least with Verizon. I highly encourage everyone to do so. Once enabled, you will need to present photo ID at a corporate Verizon store to allow your phone # to be transferred to a
107.
by dabernathy89 7y ago
There is - I guess it's not super easy to find. But if you go to the main documentation page, it's under the "Prologue" heading.
108.
by dabernathy89 7y ago
They could go into a lot more detail about exactly which provisions of tax reform helped FedEx, and how. They did not explain the 100% deduction for asset depreciation, or the fact that it's only a temporary provision of the law. They
109.
by dabernathy89 7y ago
The NYT piece seems to be a great example of factual statements not telling the full story. I'm a NYT subscriber and value their reporting, but I think they fell short here. It's easy to get a sense from the article that tax refor
110.
by dabernathy89 7y ago
Never heard anyone complain about scoping or closure issues with PHP. I'd be interested to hear more if you recall.
111.
by dabernathy89 7y ago
> Its awful documentation plays a big role in this Laravel is lauded by many for its fantastic documentation. It's not comprehensive, but it's still pretty extensive, easy to read, and the gaps are only for niche situations. As
112.
by dabernathy89 7y ago
Totally agree. I finally went "small" with the Pixel 3 after years of big phones, and the battery life is dismal. I can't see how 2800 is going to keep up with the 90hz refresh rate. If I upgrade I'll probably begrudging
113.
by dabernathy89 7y ago
I have a hard time seeing how lifecycle identifiers could be called "arbitrary" except perhaps (again) from an "under the hood" viewpoint. From an API standpoint they are explicit and extremely simple. I don't have
114.
by dabernathy89 7y ago
I wouldn't argue that hooks is a simpler programming model, except perhaps under the hood. The Hooks API is not intuitive. I'm sure once you get a hang of it it's not hard, but as a Vue developer reading Hooks code it's
115.
by dabernathy89 7y ago
I have seen this multiple times. It's almost certainly out of ignorance, and not intentional. Just someone trying to implement a slick UI without really thinking it through.
116.
by dabernathy89 7y ago
A funny looking district != a gerrymandered district. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/gerrymandering-strange-maps_n... I mean, just imagine if every district were a simple polygon. How could that possibly work with popu
117.
by dabernathy89 7y ago
> none of the developer happiness Weird, because thousands of developers are extremely happy building with Laravel.
118.
by dabernathy89 7y ago
> it is built around static methods instead of proper OOP The fake case against Laravel that never dies . The truth is found in the docs: https://laravel.com/docs/5.8/facades > Facades provide a "static
119.
by dabernathy89 8y ago
I think long-form pieces like this are interesting, but I would hardly say it'd be "difficult to cut anything out". There is a ton of fluff here. I certainly don't have time to read the whole thing.
120.
by dabernathy89 8y ago
I could see some people doing this if they notice obviously suspicious behavior on top of the safety number change, but I suppose that depends on the skill of the attacker.

More ›