dabeddabed

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by dabeddabed 3y ago

   ctrl+f+"knockout" doesn't give me a hit, in what sense are the cells used knockouts?
2. 2.▲
   by dabeddabed 3y ago

   I see, sad those potential edits will be missed from appearing in the article, still could I ask you anyways to expand about "landmark results, open problems" ?
3. 3.▲
   by dabeddabed 3y ago

   What would you add on the article about the Markov spectrum? Wikipedia can be edited by anyone
4. 4.▲
   by dabeddabed 3y ago

   thanks!
5. 5.▲
   by dabeddabed 3y ago

   Never mind I think it means the Ramanujan–Petersson conjecture
6. 6.▲
   by dabeddabed 3y ago

   "...automorphic forms, which have their own version of the Riemann hypothesis." What's the Riemann hypothesis for automorphic forms?
7. 7.▲
   by dabeddabed 3y ago

   Right that is nice point I wouldn't have think about if you hadn't draw my attention there, well that was all I will be not taking more of your time, thank you very much for answering all my doubts it was very productive for me as
8. 8.▲
   by dabeddabed 3y ago

   I think it makes sense but I also what I said before so if these really can't be compatible then I'm still confused, what I believe is that non superposing states should be a subset of any superposed state with its corresponding c
9. 9.▲
   by dabeddabed 3y ago

   Would be incorrect to consider the example where there is no superposition like a special case of the island with no entanglement? Because you should be able to classically simulate superposed states as long as these are not entangled so st
10. 10.▲
    by dabeddabed 3y ago

    Thanks for clarifying, reading your first comment again you say that you can cook up quite easily some other examples of islands like the 3 ones in the article, for the sake of curiosity I would be interested if you could give another comme
11. 11.▲
    by dabeddabed 3y ago

    Ah I see, searching a bit I think you're referring to multipartite entanglement ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multipartite_entanglement ) don't understand much from what is written there but I believe I got t
12. 12.▲
    by dabeddabed 3y ago

    If circuits without T-gates have zero "magic" and circuits without swap gates have no "interactivity" then circuits without what gates will have no entanglement? can it be characterized the same way?
13. 13.▲
    by dabeddabed 3y ago

    Don't worry I spotted your answer 4 days late. Had to read the intro to the paper to understand what you were pointing to me (in fact maybe I should have tried before asking my first question) only section 1 the rest is beyond me, if I
14. 14.▲
    by dabeddabed 3y ago

    Sincere question, the article as you do mentions the connection with the Hadwinger-Nelson problem too but I still don't see quite well how they are related, how could one pose them using mathematical terminology to better be able to co
15. 15.▲
    by dabeddabed 3y ago

    Supercool, thanks!