d_b

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by d_b 11y ago

   And by your logic, also what Canonical did. Wee! Why are you still commenting with legal speculation? You realise your name is attached to it, and you are potentially liable for misleading people?
2. 2.▲
   by d_b 11y ago

   Exactly, you don't own enough of the code to change the license nor do you have the power to just magically change the license texts to allow them to become compatible. We can't allow this one violation without allowing all.
3. 3.▲
   by d_b 11y ago

   Suse does use Btrfs for /home..
4. 4.▲
   by d_b 11y ago

   yes, lets all base our understandings on shaky legal speculation.
5. 5.▲
   by d_b 11y ago

   You're not one of the original copyright holders.. Oracle is one of the largest copyright holders. Maybe you should stop posting legal opinions when you clearly have your own bias?