Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
d357r0y3r
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
61.
▲
by
d357r0y3r
6y ago
Really unfortunate name.
62.
▲
by
d357r0y3r
6y ago
Wow. HN commenters really missed the point here. The point is that not that smart people who went into finance and law somehow fucked up. It may be a perfectly rational and good choice for them. The point is that smart, hard-working people
63.
▲
by
d357r0y3r
7y ago
Krugman doesn't believe that there's any problem with unlimited debt, so of course, he's not going to want austerity. Why would you make sacrifices when you get everything you want, today, for free? There are consequences for
64.
▲
by
d357r0y3r
7y ago
> And like the groups that promote austerity as a cure for economic woes, they have been proven wrong. This is a strawman. Austerity isn't a cure, it's a consequence. If you spend too much and have too much debt, you can't
65.
▲
by
d357r0y3r
7y ago
Some more than others.
66.
▲
by
d357r0y3r
7y ago
> Still, punish the 95% (or whatever very high number) for the shitty behavior of other 5% of people? I understand it is business and companies need to protect their profits, but this is ridiculous. Yeah, I agree. Just pointing out that
67.
▲
by
d357r0y3r
7y ago
Nah, I don't think so. Most rules come about because one person, at some point, abused the policy, and so the company tries to make a more explicit rule to prevent the abuse in the future. I don't know the specifics of this case,
68.
▲
by
d357r0y3r
7y ago
> Of course you should have the right to have that data deleted, but that's different from saying it should never be collected at all. Err...do you have that right? The whole concept of a "right to be forgotten" is a relat
69.
▲
by
d357r0y3r
7y ago
Absolutely. It's sort of the same as the "We don't negotiate with hostage-takers" policy. Once you negotiate, it's now a strategy known to work and you'll signal how good of a tactic it is.
70.
▲
by
d357r0y3r
7y ago
This is a more nuanced version of the "silence is violence" position. You're either an activist or you're part of the problem. You're either with us or against us. It's a position that makes total sense and see
71.
▲
by
d357r0y3r
7y ago
6-7 years. Totally acknowledge that the gravy train could come to an end and make life harder. Hopefully that doesn't happen or most of the folks on here will be worse off!
72.
▲
by
d357r0y3r
7y ago
Yeah, I really just have a couple of former clients that would give me as much work as I asked for. Not the most rewarding work, which is why I don't do it anymore.
73.
▲
by
d357r0y3r
7y ago
I feel like my life and career as a software guy is pretty cushy. I work probably 35 hours a week on average, remote, on a schedule I prefer. I have a ton of time left over for socializing, hobbies, TV, games, etc. But, this was a deliberat
74.
▲
by
d357r0y3r
7y ago
It's best to leverage type inference if possible. I can point to entire TypeScript files that could be copied and pasted into a JavaScript file and work with no changes. At some point, yes, you have to use annotations to get the most o
75.
▲
by
d357r0y3r
7y ago
> You're ignoring the fact that many already went through that phase and ultimately decided that complexity is the only enemy worth fighting in software. No, this doesn't match my experience. The people who resist types are usu
76.
▲
by
d357r0y3r
7y ago
Imagine creating this beast of a "framework" and not even using TypeScript or Flow. What are you thinking? Edit: It does use Flow.
77.
▲
by
d357r0y3r
8y ago
mobx-react-lite (supported by the main mobx team) uses hooks under the hood, but extends mobx-react behavior to SFCs. I don't think it creates any additional boilerplate and it aligns with the direction React is going.
78.
▲
by
d357r0y3r
8y ago
Eh, I'm like...7 years in or so. It's still pretty fun. It feels good to develop expertise and to have valuable insights that people are interested in. If I were still doing the same job as when I started, I think I'd be very
79.
▲
by
d357r0y3r
8y ago
There are multiple things happening here. I don't think a majority or even a double-digit percentage of young people have what this author is calling "hustler" mentality, but we'll ignore that, and focus on the people wh
80.
▲
by
d357r0y3r
8y ago
I'll get in any car with any stranger with Uber, no questions asked. I would never trust a stranger to walk my dog.
81.
▲
by
d357r0y3r
8y ago
The problem is, it's configuration free until it's not. If you end up having to pass in a partial Webpack config anyway, how much time are you really saying? The reality is, at this point, Webpack has become a powerful tool with a
82.
▲
by
d357r0y3r
8y ago
I understand there are many tech workers that flatly refuse to work on drone technology, especially if it may have military applications. Is there any affordance given for the possibility that some of this military technology will actually
83.
▲
by
d357r0y3r
8y ago
I'm not saying there does need to be a requirement. Businesses are not charity. If it doesn't make financial sense to make their website accessible, then they won't unless they're forced to. I'm making no value judg
84.
▲
by
d357r0y3r
8y ago
> I absolutely would if the result is that the carpenter's work is worse for it. I don't know by what metric the work is, on average, worse for it. I've been on the web since '91 and I've been more or less an obs
85.
▲
by
d357r0y3r
8y ago
For a business, at least in the United States, this is basically a financial projection problem. Unlike brick and mortar stores, there is no requirement to make web content accessible to handicapped people.
86.
▲
by
d357r0y3r
8y ago
> It is so, so easy, to be living and working in big cities like Toronto (me), SF (a bunch of you), NY, Chicago, et cetera, and truly forget the context of the absolutely awful experience a lot of people have online outside of these urba
87.
▲
by
d357r0y3r
8y ago
This is a whimsical belief. No - users actually do want more features. They want more features than you can ever hope to deliver. Figuring out which features they will actually appreciate is the tough part. Your competitors are working very
88.
▲
by
d357r0y3r
8y ago
The fact that I spent time working with the manual screwdriver is how I understand the iterative difference. The turnaround time for features is not even remotely close. One of my first jobs was maintaining and extending an ASP.NET Web Form
89.
▲
by
d357r0y3r
8y ago
> But the cultural focus is on developer happiness, on developer fun and ramping up of code-related skillsets. "How does this benefit users?" has suddenly gone missing from our vocabulary. No, it hasn't. It's still 10
90.
▲
by
d357r0y3r
8y ago
It's not family and friends, first of all. I haven't started working on anything else or for anyone else - I just no longer believe this venture is going to work out and thus have planned to exit. My co-founders don't agree w
More ›