d33

37 ms·

331.
by d33 9y ago
Even if we consider them, what do you suggest? Stop all the research?
332.
by d33 9y ago
It's a pity that the thing has to get reimplemented all over so many times. For example, you'd think you could reuse PostgreSQL's parser, but its code is autogenerated and riddled with side effects: https://github.
333.
by d33 9y ago
...as long as nothing hits the system, right? I don't know much about astrophysics, but this sounds logical: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14767295
334.
by d33 9y ago
I assume you're alluding to N-body problem? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N-body_problem
335.
by d33 9y ago
...I know you're trolling, but I seriously wonder where it would stop if we were to go down all that way.
336.
by d33 9y ago
Obligatory: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cupsys/+bug/255161 I wonder if at one point we'll end up with a crisis that will make us see excessive complexity as a bug on its own.
337.
by d33 9y ago
I can't see tags for what's CE and what's EE. Does that mean that everything is EE here?
338.
by d33 9y ago
On the other hand, can you actually make a human not repeat given action? Or explain it?
339.
by d33 9y ago
Sadly no Firefox there: > The original intention expressed by the authors was to move past the browsers as such, instead splitting the field by engine. In that sense, we sought to shed light on the security properties of Trident represen
340.
by d33 9y ago
"Linux uses a 1-1 threading model, with (to the kernel) no distinction between processes and threads -- everything is simply a runnable task." https://stackoverflow.com/a/809049 "semantic patches" p
341.
by d33 9y ago
Interesting. Are there any examples of this library being used so far? Can anybody familiar with the topic elaborate on how much can it actually simplify things and what's left to figure out?
342.
by d33 9y ago
GET is only idempotent in theory. Way too many people abuse GET when creating websites.
343.
Mathematical universe hypothesis, a.k.a. Ultimate ensemble theory(en.wikipedia.org)
3 points by d33 9y ago|0 comments
344.
by d33 9y ago
That sounds like a disturbingly huge attack surface...
345.
by d33 9y ago
It kind of baffles me that today the best solution we have to the problem of navigation is still based on the concept of having satellites in the space. Is there an ELI5 answer to why we can't have a decent system of figuring out where
346.
by d33 9y ago
> I don't know how that works, but the important part is that it does. Coding in C is already super risky, as proven by the huge number of projects that have exploitable memory errors in there. Adding complexity using features one d
347.
by d33 9y ago
Why wasn't it found with afl-fuzz?
348.
by d33 9y ago
I heard that GCC supports more architectures than LLVM. Perhaps Rust having a C backend would make sense? On the other hand, I have no idea how tightly coupled to LLVM it is.
349.
by d33 9y ago
> And since it's ARM, it's at least half-open. What do you mean by that?
350.
by d33 9y ago
Is it just me or it feels way too ugly? Multiple opaque layers of abstraction plus Rust kind of feels shoehorned when it's called from C++. Something tells me it's terribly difficult to write, debug and deploy. I don't exactl
351.
by d33 9y ago
I guess that's still relevant: https://wiki.winehq.org/ARM#Running_Windows.2Fx86_Applicatio...
352.
by d33 9y ago
> BGP is a ridiculous system of complete trust just like many older protocols. This sounds related: https://security.stackexchange.com/q/56069/15648
353.
by d33 9y ago
What's wrong with this name?
354.
by d33 9y ago
Suggestion - this logo: https://razorpay.com/blog/content/images/2018/01/34873319-a5... Should probably say "Intel" somewhere ;)
355.
by d33 9y ago
> (...) the overstretched staff didn’t have much time to support me, and I was often left crying on my own. Sometimes my tears were taken as evidence of ‘non-compliance’. This, on its own, is already outrageous. What could lead to formin
356.
by d33 9y ago
> maybe, just maybe, middle-schoolers are not ready to appreciate the complex interplay between overlapping Gauss curves, path dependence, self-fulfilling prophecies I'd say that only applies if you want it to. Otherwise, are you su
357.
WPA3 was announced(github.com)
2 points by d33 9y ago|0 comments
358.
by d33 9y ago
> Right now, It's a proof of concept; a concept which obviously is very controversial (which tells me I'm doing something right.) This is so obviously arrogant. How could one defend reasoning that if people find certain action
359.
by d33 9y ago
Is there any non-artistic reason why one would like to do it this way instead of using any programming language that's actually any readable?
360.
by d33 9y ago
...but! Will it do Meltdown?

More ›