> Right now, It's a proof of concept; a concept which obviously is very controversial (which tells me I'm doing something right.) This is so obviously arrogant

> Right now, It's a proof of concept; a concept which obviously is very controversial (which tells me I'm doing something right.) This is so obviously arrogant. How could one defend reasoning that if people find certain action controversial, it's in any way right? A controversial action just means that there's something about it that causes different opinions - it might as well be very wrong.