Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
d23
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
31.
▲
by
d23
3y ago
Needing to be approved from a waitlist is the difference.
32.
▲
by
d23
3y ago
I would invert that question and ask what, to you, would qualify as being sufficiently new that it doesn’t have? To me, there are tons of things. The death / checkpoint system, weapon durability, the massive non-linear open world, th
33.
▲
by
d23
3y ago
I'm assuming the cost is entirely to make up for labor.
34.
▲
by
d23
3y ago
Going to predict he’s completely unable to not meddle in the decisions of the CEO, and either the CEO is as erratic as he is and is fine with it or she is not and is no longer in the role within a short amount of time.
35.
▲
by
d23
3y ago
And head of product. You know, because of his razor sharp social media product sense.
36.
▲
by
d23
3y ago
It’s very difficult for me to wrap my head around people that aren’t blown away by both this and generative image AIs, and I tend to be in the skeptical side when it comes to fancy tech adoption.
37.
▲
by
d23
3y ago
It’s definitely awesome for that, but for me, on side projects even in languages I’m familiar with, getting ChatGPT to write the boring annoying stuff, or things that would require a bit of referencing (like a library I’ve not completely me
38.
▲
by
d23
3y ago
Example 1000 of his disingenuous, bad faith behavior
39.
▲
by
d23
3y ago
Really insane how numb we’ve become. This would be unthinkable just a short time ago, and now I’m not even sure anyone is surprised.
40.
▲
by
d23
3y ago
Any thoughts on any part of the article itself?
41.
▲
by
d23
3y ago
> It's absurd that you ignored half the comment you were responding to. Whatever point you might have had, you burned all your credibility when you decided to make a dishonest argument by taking someone else's words out of cont
42.
▲
by
d23
3y ago
Thank you for the informed response. The other answers were causing me pain.
43.
▲
by
d23
3y ago
Any attorneys here that can discuss the nuances involved in knowingly lying to the court, which I believe carries penalties for the attorney? And why / whether that would or wouldn’t apply here?
44.
▲
by
d23
3y ago
I’d really like a one click manual blocking extension for Firefox. The only one I could find last time I looked appeared to be broken.
45.
▲
by
d23
3y ago
The context is as readily available as it gets -- it was the message I was responding to. It's absurd to reduce all investors to "government manipulators and monetary system monopolists". In what way were all the victims of
46.
▲
by
d23
3y ago
Seeing no ethical issues with lying and fraud at a mass scale is an interesting take.
47.
▲
by
d23
3y ago
I think this would be an issue in any study. I assume the purpose of a double blind is not to convince those in the treatment group they have taken nothing — it’s to convince those in the placebo group they’ve taken something, and then mea
48.
▲
by
d23
3y ago
The problem: where are you getting literally any of this from? You’ve hopped up like 4 chains of unfounded assumptions.
49.
▲
by
d23
3y ago
For 300 million dollars, I think I'd manage.
50.
▲
by
d23
3y ago
What does it matter? How is it relevant to the article or his reason for leaving Google?
51.
▲
by
d23
3y ago
> said he did not want to publicly criticize Google or other companies until he had quit his job. This seems to me to be the only line in the article that is incorrect or incongruent with what he is now saying - specifically the use of “
52.
▲
by
d23
3y ago
This seems roughly in line with the article. He left to talk about the dangers.
53.
▲
by
d23
3y ago
> But then journalists, who got the check as a matter of course by their employment, started treating it as a mark of credibility and demanding people they didn't like be stripped of their check. Never once saw any of this.
54.
▲
by
d23
3y ago
I'm confused as to how you felt the author is justifying it: > Now, I would personally feel shame if I did these things. They seem more interested in trying to find a solution to it. Or just posing it as a legitimate problem, the s
55.
▲
by
d23
3y ago
Great article. Sums up what I've observed over my entire career. Incentives are orthogonal at best to what is actually good for the company, and at times, doing things that actively harm the company can be the way up the ladder. We&
56.
▲
by
d23
3y ago
Weird, I still get no results, even if I search incognito.
57.
▲
Why is GitHub search so terrible?
3 points
by
d23
3y ago
|
2 comments
58.
▲
by
d23
3y ago
It is not possible for us to “go back to the way things were” at the scale at which we consume meat and animal products today. Even if it were possible, I highly doubt it would be any more sustainable or environmentally friendly, and none
59.
▲
by
d23
3y ago
> We found strong correlations between greater consumption of fat and protein to lower anxiety and depression > We have shown that changing diet affects mood and happiness, that greater fat and carbohydrate intake is directly associa
60.
▲
by
d23
3y ago
> I don’t think Musk was intending to deceive with FSD If it were an outlier event, sure. But his entire motive seems to be to deceive; he's pathologically disingenuous. He has not earned the benefit of the doubt.
More ›