d1sxeyes

38 ms·

811.
by d1sxeyes 3y ago
In and of itself no. But in the context of responding to someone saying “your comment reminded me that some people don’t have a scientific background” can be read in a similar way to saying “your comment reminded me that not everyone on Ha
812.
by d1sxeyes 3y ago
It's pretty clear from the article that he was paid ~5K USD to replicate a piece of work he'd already created twice before—bank notes arranged to demonstrate average annual income. The museum also gave him the money that would f
813.
by d1sxeyes 3y ago
You don't actually have to crash the jet, just tell everyone you did.
814.
by d1sxeyes 3y ago
Probably because it’s the out-of-the-box functionality on ServiceNow or whatever tool they’re using.
815.
by d1sxeyes 3y ago
I was also under the impression this was true, but in fact structuring is its own crime, even if the money was obtained legally.
816.
by d1sxeyes 3y ago
Honestly, I wouldn’t know. I work in one of the big SSCs here, and I’m not really involved in the software startup scene here.
817.
by d1sxeyes 3y ago
It translates exactly. In oenology, it is indeed referred to as the 'nose' of the wine in English. I've also heard it used for whiskey.
818.
by d1sxeyes 3y ago
I live in Budapest, my salary is around $53K. My wife doesn't work (although she does get maternity benefits which come to around 650USD/mo. I live a comfortable life. I rent a flat in the city centre which is big enough for me, m
819.
by d1sxeyes 3y ago
The engineering controls don't independently make systems safe, they make things more reliable and cost-effective, and hopefully reduce the number of times the process controls kick in. The process controls do however independently mak
820.
by d1sxeyes 3y ago
I would love to. But it wouldn’t be true.
821.
by d1sxeyes 3y ago
I guess it only applies to VS Code. The version number is wrong and the description of “open source” don’t apply to Visual Studio. Mistake is in the article.
822.
by d1sxeyes 3y ago
> It makes me wonder if there wasn't someone who was fixing these as they came up in the 4 hour window, and he just happened to be off that day. This is very possible. I know of a guy who does (or at least a few years ago did) 24x7
823.
by d1sxeyes 3y ago
Well, if the primary is known not to be in a good state, you might as well fail over and hope that the issue was a fried disk or a cosmic bit flip or something. The real safety feature is the 4 hour lead time before manual processing become
824.
by d1sxeyes 3y ago
Oh for sure, but I doubt anyone would call orange juice a 'fermented' drink, compared to wine/beer/kefir/etc.
825.
by d1sxeyes 3y ago
And non-fermented foods like orange juice, which can have upwards of 0.5% alcohol content.
826.
by d1sxeyes 3y ago
While the person I'm responding to may be upset that 'premise' seems to be acquiring a second meaning in this specific circumstance, they are almost certainly not correct that OP 'want[s]' to say premises. OP almost
827.
by d1sxeyes 3y ago
This is not correct. 'On premise' (normally hyphenated) refers to servers hosted by the same organisation as the application owner, and is opposed to cloud. It is correct to say that an application runs 'on premise', if
828.
by d1sxeyes 3y ago
That's a bit of an oversimplification of my point. Profit is not a blanket justification for everything. However, when considering the legitimate interests of a company, it's important to look at the services they are offering (an
829.
by d1sxeyes 3y ago
I have to say, that privacy policy is pretty comprehensive, and the questions they are asking seem fair. They don't need to prove that they NEED it, just that they have a legitimate interest in collecting it which outweighs your right
830.
by d1sxeyes 3y ago
To be fair, if we're watching a 25fps iPhone recording of 12fps feed being played through a 60Hz monitor, the "zooming/tilting/"WOW!" crap" would keep the iPhone framerate, so it doesn't necessarily t
831.
by d1sxeyes 3y ago
Hm, so essentially your argument is that an object is a label that we put upon a quantity of stuff ? I'm not sure that I agree, but for the sake of argument, even if I accept that principle, you can still count how many of that quanti
832.
by d1sxeyes 3y ago
Still the same. Thanks, I'll try and find it somewhere, I think it seems like an interesting watch.
833.
by d1sxeyes 3y ago
Not available in my (EU) country. Are you aware of any other links to this? I’m interested but a quick google showed nothing
834.
by d1sxeyes 3y ago
If you reject the idea that objects exist, then of course they will resist attempts to count them.
835.
by d1sxeyes 3y ago
If I have one widget, and someone gives me a widget, I now have two widgets. If I then need to give someone one widget, then I will have one widget left. If someone else needs a widget, and so I break my widget in half and we share, I have
836.
by d1sxeyes 3y ago
Could be. There are plenty of potential explanations which don't amount to 'this is fake', but I am fairly confident this has been doctored in some way.
837.
by d1sxeyes 3y ago
No, I think you're right to be suspicious of this .If you step forward frame by frame from 18s, (pause, then use '.' and ','), you can see that the loss of focus occurred before the helicopter was hit. By watching
838.
by d1sxeyes 3y ago
2009 was when FB introduced the 'like' button, which I think burdens the majority of the responsibility for the decline of the quality of interactions on Facebook. Gathering 'likes' was addictive, and because of the low
839.
by d1sxeyes 3y ago
Fair, I should perhaps have clarified that I meant music chosen by the listener. Roughly I would say around the time the Walkman was invented.
840.
by d1sxeyes 3y ago
My point is subtly different, I think. The point I’m trying to make is that if you’re “at rest” in space, all of your movement is through time. If you are “at rest” in time, all of your movement is through space. As far as I understand it,

More ›