czbond

37 ms·

631.
by czbond 6y ago
I purchased the 16" solely for the T2 chip. Then vuln'ed - curses!
632.
by czbond 6y ago
> Banning drug use by force is a US pipe dream. It's impossible. Is it though? If harder drugs were legal, wouldn't harder drug use be much more common? Cannabis is one thing, the perceived impact to oneself is relatively low.
633.
by czbond 6y ago
Wow - that's nuts. Thanks for posting; And here I stress out to make sure the exact amount I owe is correctly reported. Oh well, better to sleep at night soundly on that issue!
634.
by czbond 6y ago
Yeah, Original statement was logic only. Followup was on how specific areas might be 'cash only' hotspots that diverge from the mean tax paid for occupations, revenue, or other criteria.
635.
by czbond 6y ago
My assumption is not empirically correct, I agree, but neither is the belief that IRS audits of mass populations is politically motivated. It is simply ease, right? Easier to audit where it is easy returns, or where one will get a high retu
636.
by czbond 6y ago
After reflection, my guess is it would be that in those neighborhoods they have identified a largely 'paid in cash, under-reported' behavior. For example, if nationally a person with "career x" makes $45k, yet reports $1
637.
by czbond 6y ago
I would suggest the opposite. IRS realizes the only revenue they're likely to extract correctly are small business owners, and middle to upper class who don't have the time nor legal fee tolerance to fight it. They already extract
638.
by czbond 6y ago
I used to feel the same way (specifically around the Fed and Treasury and national debt) - until I realized, it's just a number on a screen. They print dollars as easily as you and I print from our local printer. The digits are all are
639.
by czbond 6y ago
I believe the way for more technically minded folks to approach startups is this: I will fail, I will fail many times, I can lose a lot of time and money. I should see if people will pay me before I build it. Startups are REALLY, REALLY har
640.
by czbond 6y ago
Whoa - thank you for sharing that.
641.
by czbond 6y ago
I don't know why you're being downvoted. Increased exercise helps me: sleep better, have more energy, and look better. That is quality to me.
642.
by czbond 6y ago
Wholly agree in most cases the trade is not worth the equity
643.
by czbond 6y ago
Founders can, his situation varies. Either QSBS or ideally through 83(b) (where one pays all taxes on company stock at founding in first 30'ish days).
644.
by czbond 6y ago
Which is true, but so is my phrase of "If you want to go broke, found a startup". It cuts very deep on the south side often for founders - whereas employees do get a paycheck. Founders will go YEARS often with little to no income.
645.
by czbond 6y ago
While I don't disagree that my suggestion is what will happen - in speaking with many founders they cited the egregious tax (it was more than 0.5%) as a reason for setting up shop outside the city. Which leads me to believe it was impa
646.
by czbond 6y ago
People will attempt to prove the counter with theoretical, I have an actual to support your claim. Years ago, Denver placed a tax on companies that create software. By "magic", companies decided to found outside the county lines i
647.
by czbond 6y ago
Good discussion - I respectfully disagree. It increases downstream risk to GH enterprise, and means the risk flows to security team setup at on-prem clients, whom often have no security team - or a few security engineers possibly. And they&
648.
by czbond 6y ago
I've now realized I need to be less obfuscating in my suggestions on HN. Literal appears to be the only way. I was suggesting around the corners for people to begin connecting further dots.
649.
by czbond 6y ago
Sign with GPG for the hash, as linked. The methods you mentioned do allow malicious modification. Signing the commit with a public key makes it a lot more difficult. In the same vein, one can spoof email - but DKIM, SPF, DMARC together as c
650.
by czbond 6y ago
Being downvoted bc of why? I literally said THE MOST obvious purposefully and left out the 20+ other things that a good security researcher would hunt down in this - each to allow compromise of the company, build process, downstream or some
651.
by czbond 6y ago
Tesla did not (a few years back if I recall). If I had to swing, I'd say 98% of companies do not. Git does not make it trivial to impersonate commits. http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/signing-git-commits
652.
by czbond 6y ago
If so, they need their security team on that. They need to protect their Gemfile bc it would show attack vectors.
653.
by czbond 6y ago
I may have been - but it opened up a whole new thought process. Imagine bounded logic competing for resources and otherwise causing mis-appropriated logic. Profound.
654.
by czbond 6y ago
Clever.... :)
655.
by czbond 6y ago
<had a comment, it was snarky, bad taste, removing. even if accurate>
656.
by czbond 6y ago
I had always heard GitHub was running on Rails - but I always thought "sure some section of it is". Not ALL on rails - with models and controllers in there.
657.
by czbond 6y ago
As a product/CompSci person - I like your onboarding workflow. (do agree it is a bit long), but understand from customer discovery perspective. Was allowed to proceed - but I need a path that doesn't require access to my calendar.
658.
by czbond 6y ago
I love the application of phrasing of "race conditions" to one's logic; I had never thought of that concept. And your deduction on the outcome is very likely!
659.
by czbond 6y ago
You're either really good, or have aspiration to be that much better - right? Those who don't meet one of those criteria probably won't pay for a planner. But I agree the phrasing is odd.
660.
by czbond 6y ago
I agree with you. My view now when approaching all (and similar) situations in life - is "Can someone with mild to average intelligence interpret this negatively against me and act upon that perception?" Because let's be hone

More ›