cybersnowflake

14 ms·

91.
by cybersnowflake 7y ago
"Build more Housing" is not the answer. Okay fine, add "Not everybody in the world needs to or should live in San Francisco or Manhattan" to the list of rules
92.
by cybersnowflake 7y ago
I said competing not necessarily having sex. Also the numbers are for illustrative purposes, its impossible to know the precise figure but the paradigm itself is very real. Women have a far easier time having relationships with men and wome
93.
by cybersnowflake 7y ago
Its not rocket science. All but the ugliest women can get sex/relationships more easily than all but perhaps the most attractive men. You have the top 90% of women competing for the top 10% (guessimate but its around there) of men whil
94.
by cybersnowflake 7y ago
Obviously there are many factors, those included but I wouldn't be as quick to discount ideological factors as many people are doing. The Metoo stuff...actually this has been bubbling long before as a general feature of puritanical 3rd
95.
by cybersnowflake 7y ago
Just because you say things are simple doesn't mean they are... https://thewaterpipe.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/capture.png... https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/06/netflix-five-se
96.
by cybersnowflake 7y ago
Another difference would be that the kind of redistribution Obama favors is compelled for one side of the equation while charity is more or less voluntary depending upon your vision of what the divine requires.
97.
by cybersnowflake 7y ago
Well, according to some statistics yes... https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/oct/30/religious-p... but saying christians visit the elderly for a first date does not necessarily imply nobody but ch
98.
by cybersnowflake 7y ago
Anyone who thinks autism is just a difference in personality that doesn't need treatment is welcome to foot the bill for all the people including my nephew who has difficulty talking and cannot live independently now and may very well
99.
by cybersnowflake 7y ago
All you guys using freemarket/private enterprise excuses to support this have no justification supporting net neutrality or any antidiscrimination 'public accommodation' laws ie (forced SSM cake baking, government interferenc
100.
by cybersnowflake 7y ago
You don't see population shrinkage as necessarily bad, well I don't think population growth as necessarily bad. Overall in the modern West theres been a lot more propaganda against the latter. Risky business really, because I get
101.
by cybersnowflake 7y ago
I'll wager a buck in 10 years you (assuming you don't die from something unrelated) will be here and the world will still be here pretty much as it is today except with a few more whizbang gadgets. And people will still be screami
102.
by cybersnowflake 8y ago
The only thing Gab/Dissenter itself does is have less speech restrictions than their competitors. Are you saying thats political?
103.
by cybersnowflake 8y ago
>Mozilla themselves has said that they didn't remove it for political reasons [or "ideological censorship" as you put it] So basically you're saying you'd be okay if there's one place you could speak freely
104.
by cybersnowflake 8y ago
There is no sign at Gab saying 'no commies allowed' At its core, Gab itself is apolitical or at least far more so than its rivals. The left are welcome to use it as much as the right. The main difference is that Gab allows more fr
105.
by cybersnowflake 8y ago
True freedom of speech ultimately comes from a society's culture and morality not a law. The 1st Amendment doesn't mean much if the powerful can harass and intimidate its opponents into silence while still remaining in the technic