4 ms·

Well, according to some statistics yes... https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/oct/30/religious-people-more-likely-give-charity-study/ https://www.washing

Well, according to some statistics yes... https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/oct/30/religious-people-more-likely-give-charity-study/ https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/oct/30/religious-p... but saying christians visit the elderly for a first date does not necessarily imply nobody but christians are generous in any way.

inferiorhuman 7y ago
Well, according to some statistics yes... And there it is. While I'm sure a study conducted by the "Institute on Faith & Giving" and published by a Moonie paper is objective it misses quite a bit by assuming that donating to charity is the only measure of empathy or generosity. https://www.philanthropy.com/article/America-s-Generosity-Divide/156175 https://www.philanthropy.com/article/America-s-Generosity-Di... Take a look a the states that rank towards the bottom of the list (mostly New England) and those that rank at the top (e.g. Alabama). Or take a look at how empathy is framed as a McCain vs Obama thing. What's missing from that sort of narrative is that Obama pushed government welfare where McCain fought it, that Massachusetts will have far more mature safety nets than Alabama. Supporting universal access to health care is no less empathetic than donating to a religious charity, the only difference is in who you trust to dole out the resources.
- cybersnowflake 7y ago
  Another difference would be that the kind of redistribution Obama favors is compelled for one side of the equation while charity is more or less voluntary depending upon your vision of what the divine requires.
  - inferiorhuman 7y ago
    Another difference would be that the kind of redistribution Obama favors is compelled for one side of the equation Sure, and there are plenty of welfare programs that predate Obama. Welfare programs that were, in large part, created by elected officials.

inferiorhuman 7y ago

Well, according to some statistics yes... And there it is. While I'm sure a study conducted by the "Institute on Faith & Giving" and published by a Moonie paper is objective it misses quite a bit by assuming that donating to charity is the only measure of empathy or generosity. https://www.philanthropy.com/article/America-s-Generosity-Divide/156175 https://www.philanthropy.com/article/America-s-Generosity-Di... Take a look a the states that rank towards the bottom of the list (mostly New England) and those that rank at the top (e.g. Alabama). Or take a look at how empathy is framed as a McCain vs Obama thing. What's missing from that sort of narrative is that Obama pushed government welfare where McCain fought it, that Massachusetts will have far more mature safety nets than Alabama. Supporting universal access to health care is no less empathetic than donating to a religious charity, the only difference is in who you trust to dole out the resources.

cybersnowflake 7y ago
Another difference would be that the kind of redistribution Obama favors is compelled for one side of the equation while charity is more or less voluntary depending upon your vision of what the divine requires.
- inferiorhuman 7y ago
  Another difference would be that the kind of redistribution Obama favors is compelled for one side of the equation Sure, and there are plenty of welfare programs that predate Obama. Welfare programs that were, in large part, created by elected officials.