cy6erlion

9 ms·

1.
by cy6erlion 10mo ago
As I said before in another thread [0] This is the way to go, what we need are modular open standards for both hardware and software. Imagine a phone that you can just swap and mix components from different manufacturers. You could buy the
2.
by cy6erlion 1y ago
Great post. Why use Social Media when you can use your own blog with RSS. I think it's because of Network effects, Social Media gives you an identity/address within a social network that has demand for your posts and a supply of p
3.
by cy6erlion 1y ago
> How do you move past the initial hurdle of the at least several first iterations of this device being inferior to the competition in every single way, though? I think it will initially be a phone for hackers, and they will develop the
4.
by cy6erlion 1y ago
Yes, I forgot to add a standard camera on the list. I think if there's an open standard that different organizations can contribute to things will move faster and will be cheaper than having single organization trying to build a new Li
5.
by cy6erlion 1y ago
I think instead of a particular phone or brand what we need are open standards for a mobile platform. - RISCV processor - Standard Logic board - Standard Screen - Standard Battery - Standard Wifi & Bluetooth modem - Probably ditch cellu
6.
by cy6erlion 2y ago
Just use darktable and gimp.
7.
by cy6erlion 2y ago
> Is there an alternative? Decentralized protocols
8.
by cy6erlion 2y ago
lights a candle for torvalds and burns incense for stallman
9.
by cy6erlion 2y ago
Speaking has sound but that is still just words with the same logic structure. "Colours, light, shade and space" have entirely different logic.
10.
by cy6erlion 5y ago
> Let's say you're building some form of appliance on top of general purpose x86 hardware. You want to be able to verify the software it's running hasn't been tampered with. What's the best approach with existin
11.
by cy6erlion 6y ago
Shameless plug, CLI for reading IETF RFCs. https://github.com/cy6erlion/ietf You will read this RFC like this: $ ietf -n 1178
12.
by cy6erlion 6y ago
Good point, but their name does not imply that their cookies are free.
13.
by cy6erlion 6y ago
Playing chess does not make you smarter but studying chess does. You see when you decide to study chess theoretically you come to a point where you want to figure out a system to increase your chances of winning. Chess is very dynamic and
14.
by cy6erlion 6y ago
Also add a VR and AR, that will be super cool.
15.
by cy6erlion 6y ago
> you can't decide to see the color blue Once I have seen it I can always visualize the color blue because color can be stored in memory and IMO that is why computers can describe color. But even if I was once happy I can never visu
16.
by cy6erlion 6y ago
Senses are for collecting sense data, emotions are a state of being they are experienced in real-time and can never symbolized or described. You cannot tell someone what happiness is they ave to experience it for themselves. Sensed data can
17.
by cy6erlion 6y ago
Thank you for the link, interesting stuff. I think about this all the time, it is interesting to see other viewpoints. I believe that everything we know, feel and are aware of in the universe requires some consciousness as an entry point. I
18.
by cy6erlion 6y ago
> We have to ask ourselves can we prove that we're any different than an input & output machine first Conscious is not dependent on the senses or even (Input & Output). We can be asleep and be conscious while dreaming.
19.
by cy6erlion 6y ago
Can we have emotions without consciousness?
20.
by cy6erlion 6y ago
I see, but what about other emotions (love)
21.
by cy6erlion 6y ago
Yes, consciousness is at a higher level, but if we have an entity that can be conscious it should also have the ability to have emotions because we are conscious of emotions.
22.
by cy6erlion 6y ago
If AI can be conscious then every human can voluntarily feel happiness (or any other emotion) anytime anywhere. Everything in a computer depends on symbols, we cannot symbolize happiness with language we can only describe it to others but t
23.
ISPs and Tunnel Vision (2019)(cy6erlion.keybase.pub)
31 points by cy6erlion 7y ago|8 comments
24.
by cy6erlion 7y ago
deep tangle
25.
by cy6erlion 7y ago
If we are in a simulation it will be difficult to know that we are in a simulation because what we use to identify the simulation (mind) is itself simulated, our notion of simulation is acquired within the simulation. We are in this black b
26.
by cy6erlion 7y ago
> Capitalism itself is naturally centralizing. That is why we have anti-thrust laws. We don't just leave it to consumers to make sure centralization does not happen in the market. It is the job of the government to prevent it. Centr
27.
by cy6erlion 7y ago
I see this as a problem with trust. Decentralized systems require less trust for them to work (think consensus mechanisms) but ironically users today don't trust the tech because it is still early IMO, centralized systems need more tru
28.
A Tree Falls in a P2P Network(cy6erlion.gitlab.io)
4 points by cy6erlion 7y ago|0 comments
29.
by cy6erlion 7y ago
What if violent crime is the cause of air pollution.
30.
by cy6erlion 7y ago
Thank you for creating Leaflet!

More ›