cwillu

27 ms·

631.
by cwillu 9mo ago
And what about the people he harasses who are literally stopped?
632.
by cwillu 9mo ago
He's specifically harassing people who are literally stopped: “Then he sees it: a driver idling in the late afternoon gridlock while scrolling his phone. Perfect.”
633.
by cwillu 9mo ago
Yes, that's what makes it a living wage instead of a poverty wage, let alone a starvation wage.
634.
by cwillu 9mo ago
You're confusing poverty with living.
635.
by cwillu 9mo ago
90% of passenger cars in north america are gas powered
636.
by cwillu 9mo ago
“Mac will try hard not to let you run this; it will tell you the app is damaged and can’t be opened and helpfully offer to trash it for you. From a terminal you can xattr -cr /path/to/OpenCiv3.app to enable running it.” How f
637.
by cwillu 9mo ago
We're allowed to create laws to avoid a result we don't like, regardless of how many good intentions paved the road that brought us to that result.
638.
by cwillu 9mo ago
“For certain tax and criminal investigations, French law operates a distinction between legal advice privilege and litigation privilege. While litigation privilege is always protected, legal advice privilege is not protected when (i) the in
639.
by cwillu 9mo ago
Just getting 404 not found
640.
by cwillu 9mo ago
The first fundraising banner on wikipedia was in 2003. That is unquestionably an advertisement, and not even an ethical one given the misleading nature of their campaigns these days.
641.
by cwillu 9mo ago
…again.
642.
by cwillu 9mo ago
Yes yes, your 30 word dismissal completely obliterates all contrary evidence.
643.
by cwillu 9mo ago
The relevant jurisdiction isn't the US either.
644.
by cwillu 9mo ago
You appear to have lost the thread (or maybe you're replying to things directly from the newcomments feed? If so, please stop it.), we're talking about what sort of incriminating written statements the raid might hope to discover
645.
by cwillu 9mo ago
“ 298 (1) A defamatory libel is matter published, without lawful justification or excuse, that is likely to injure the reputation of any person by exposing him to hatred, contempt or ridicule, or that is designed to insult the person of
646.
by cwillu 9mo ago
Which is great until you have to troubleshoot an error code surfaced by a nasty web of code with no idea where it came from because the simplest way to handle err is to re-return it, optionally (and more or less uselessly) wrapping it in a
647.
by cwillu 9mo ago
If libeling real people is a harm to those people, then altering photos of real children is certainly also a harm to those children.
648.
by cwillu 9mo ago
Or “regulators don't understand the technology; short of turning it off entirely, there's nothing we can do to prevent it entirely, and the costs involved in attempting to reduce it are much greater than the likely fine, especiall
649.
by cwillu 9mo ago
I get what you're trying to say, but the computer science version of that article is very clearly https://www.scottaaronson.com/papers/bb.pdf
650.
by cwillu 9mo ago
Your comment is a complaint that the submission is inappropriate, why would you write it here? “Please don't complain that a submission is inappropriate. If a story is spam or off-topic, flag it. Don't feed egregious comments by r
651.
by cwillu 9mo ago
“[…] Most […]” “[…] probably […]”
652.
by cwillu 9mo ago
Dangerous driving is a criminal offense
653.
by cwillu 9mo ago
Maybe 20 years ago, but considering the combination of surveillance capabilities and llm workflows with the political climate, I don't think that will remain true.
654.
by cwillu 9mo ago
> The Waymo was speeding in a school zone Source? The article doesn't list a speed limit, but highways.dot.gov suggests to me that the speed limit would be 25mph in the school zone, in which case the waymo was going significantly
655.
by cwillu 9mo ago
30kph is the posted speed limit in school zones here, precisely because it's an appropriately slow speed for the context.
656.
by cwillu 9mo ago
“With secure-boot+attestation, the vendors can choose not to let you download the latest map data, report you to the authorities” As far as I'm concerned, you just conceded the argument.
657.
by cwillu 9mo ago
Juxtaposing with the quoted passage from the post: “Because vitamin D is potentially toxic, intake of [1000 IU/day] has been avoided even though the weight of evidence shows that the currently accepted [limit] of [2000 IU/day] is
658.
by cwillu 9mo ago
According to your own numbers, Clinton and Obama managed to to deport 15 million people, and somehow they managed to do it without executing any citizens in the street.
659.
by cwillu 9mo ago
And from this you can safely conclude that users will be under severe pressure to surrender them.
660.
by cwillu 9mo ago
Like evil maid attacks, this is a vanishingly rare scenario brought out to try to justify technology that will overwhelmingly be used to restrict computing freedom.

More ›