Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
curyous
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
61.
▲
by
curyous
9y ago
Thanks for sharing your story.
62.
▲
by
curyous
9y ago
If you make yourself vulnerable, a competitor can exploit it.
63.
▲
by
curyous
9y ago
Political correctness is used to persecute and bully people. I'm surprised that many don't see it.
64.
▲
by
curyous
9y ago
Great thoughts.
65.
▲
by
curyous
9y ago
Bitcoin Cash scales far better than Litecoin.
66.
▲
by
curyous
9y ago
So true. Premature generality is a big problem.
67.
▲
by
curyous
9y ago
Bitcoin Cash can easily scale. There never was a "scaling problem." The only problem is "people that don't want Bitcoin to scale." https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoincash/comments/7gmn8t&
68.
▲
by
curyous
9y ago
This is all fixed with Bitcoin Cash.
69.
▲
by
curyous
9y ago
Be careful of linking to the whitepaper on the bitcoin.org site, they have contemplated changing it in the past. Best to link to the one on bitcoin.com: https://www.bitcoin.com/bitcoin.pdf
70.
▲
by
curyous
9y ago
I don't see any evidence that Bitcoin's being used for money laundering at any decent scale. Bitcoin's not anonymous and it's far easier to launder money using USD. Bitcoin can't be used for money laundering at larg
71.
▲
by
curyous
9y ago
I think they're trying to get rid of cash too.
72.
▲
by
curyous
9y ago
Do you have a problem with Ver helping to restore Bitcoin’s original functionality of making instant, practically free transactions? If you don’t like BCH then don’t use it, you can leave that to everyone else.
73.
▲
by
curyous
9y ago
Data attributes seem like the right way to me.
74.
▲
by
curyous
9y ago
After 15 years of software development, watching Casey's videos changed how I code. His approach feels right. He's amazing, I'm very grateful for his series.
75.
▲
by
curyous
9y ago
Over time as tech gets better, Bitcoin can handle more than 20M users without layer 2 services.
76.
▲
by
curyous
9y ago
Layer 2 services are not needed at all.
77.
▲
by
curyous
9y ago
This article gets it completely wrong. Bitcoin can handle much more than 20M users without layer 2 services. Layer 2 services are a solution looking for a problem that doesn't exist.
78.
▲
by
curyous
9y ago
What's an ADT?
79.
▲
by
curyous
9y ago
This article is very skewed, it's annoying that she wrote things like "which he claimed was backed up by studies." rather than "which are backed up by studies."
80.
▲
by
curyous
9y ago
Seriously? If you think that men and women don't differ by more than their genitals, then you have to ignore all modern science.
81.
▲
by
curyous
9y ago
FYI, a network with 1000x more on-chain transactions, that everyone uses, is much more difficult to censor, than one that requires bank-like organisation with IOUs to the main chain.
82.
▲
by
curyous
9y ago
Big blocks increase decentralization and censorship resistance by allowing many more transactions and many more users.
83.
▲
by
curyous
9y ago
Not caring about what other people think is necessary for doing pioneering work.
84.
▲
by
curyous
9y ago
Great in-depth analysis that goes beyond what's obvious on the surface.
85.
▲
by
curyous
10y ago
Great to see this view, it meshes with my experience. Making your code testable does terrible things to the design.
86.
▲
by
curyous
10y ago
Aren't these the people that failed to defend Aaron Swartz?
87.
▲
by
curyous
10y ago
The whole premise of this article as espoused in the first sentence, seems rather divorced from reality, to me.
88.
▲
by
curyous
10y ago
Why couldn't they have used "func" for functions, like so many languages do, instead of "fun"?
89.
▲
by
curyous
10y ago
A JIT faster than C? I thought in theory it would always have to be slower because you have the overhead of the JITing. Also, isn't compiling C to native, the best you can hope for anyway? What could be faster than that, except for asm
90.
▲
by
curyous
10y ago
It's not stealing, it's sharing. You're not depriving anyone of anything. It's not a lost sale. The TV and movie industries are making more money than they ever have, because of all the sharing.
More ›