curlyQueue

5 ms·

1.
by curlyQueue 6y ago
Feel compelled to provide context on a double-standard, here are just a few counter examples of leaders in US politics who have, with their speech, “promoted conspiracy theories” and “incited violence” with no measures taken to make them ac
2.
by curlyQueue 6y ago
Reputable source who goes over Instagrams latest, quick 10 min: https://youtu.be/VhSX7IzHkrE
3.
by curlyQueue 6y ago
Sorry I thought I did via examples? My bad, let me say it directly: It’s the people who work for the “government,” working directly with corporations to suppress speech. 230 won’t protect corporations from libel suits filed against them. On
4.
by curlyQueue 6y ago
Still really confused man... The line I drew is based on the law regarding child pornography— the example you’ve chosen to make a point. There is no point... because it’s illegal? While the other examples I gave aren’t illegal? It’s pretty
5.
by curlyQueue 6y ago
Man you deleted the part about the leftist straw man lol!! You lost me honest to God, and I am going to leave this here... I still stand by my original statement, acknowledging my choice of words isn’t perfect but the main idea is there. An
6.
by curlyQueue 6y ago
I have, and it becomes a first amendment issue when you build the case, like I did, and like everyone who’s tracking this. I hope you can acknowledge that. And surprisingly, it didn’t take me that long to put that together, maybe 3 min lol.
7.
Simon and Schuster cancels publication of Hawley's book(thehill.com)
4 points by curlyQueue 6y ago|2 comments
8.
by curlyQueue 6y ago
How does this rate with what’s happening? Surely folks have an opinion.. it’s about big tech! Side q: Anyone know Laura Loomer? Check out her suit from 2018. Seems prophetic from today’s vantage point.
9.
by curlyQueue 6y ago
Beautifully put... would love someone to respond to this in a meaningful way :-) Thanks for asking.
10.
by curlyQueue 6y ago
Agreed. We are in a time where language is changing with no questions asked. (moronically but nonetheless - amen:a-woman? Hate speech? Removing gendered terms while insisting on identifying as a gender) Look up New Speak from 1984. This is
11.
by curlyQueue 6y ago
How do you link (legally) hate speech (protected by constitution) -> “direct” violence -> individuals -> charges? Haven’t seen evidence of that in any of these cases, by companies, MSM, legal parties, or honest people—- especially
12.
by curlyQueue 6y ago
Interesting comparison. Dignifying with a simple example: Child porn != Video promoting peace by President Trump Child porn != Speaking freely about election fraud, and spreading information as such. The difference is child porn is clearly
13.
by curlyQueue 6y ago
Asking you respectfully to please take 15 mins and watch these two videos, can do much better than I can: https://youtu.be/8SicsQervb4 https://youtu.be/xH9XWNz0GW4
14.
by curlyQueue 6y ago
Strong comment. Humor me by explaining this coordinated attack in the context of what is guaranteed by the first amendment, perhaps I am missing something?: - YouTube says it will no longer allow users to upload videos claiming that Preside
15.
by curlyQueue 6y ago
Thanks for this. Put it better than I could!
16.
by curlyQueue 6y ago
There is no argument for censorship, suspension or banning, based on our 1st amendment—- on any of the multiple platforms doing so. I came on here just to check what the “young intellectual tech” community thinks— I consider myself part of
17.
by curlyQueue 6y ago
There is no argument for censorship, suspension or banning, based on our 1st amendment—- on any of the multiple platforms doing so. I came on here just to check what the “young intellectual tech” community thinks— I consider myself part of
18.
by curlyQueue 6y ago
There is no argument for censorship, suspension or banning, based on our 1st amendment—- on any of the multiple platforms doing so. I came on here just to check what the “young intellectual tech” community thinks— I consider myself part of
19.
by curlyQueue 6y ago
I’ll have to give that a watch, didn’t realize he had a Ted talk! My favorites so far are “what its like living in California” and “instagrams new terms of service - not sketchy at all!” The Brett Pella on Californians moving back to Califo
20.
by curlyQueue 6y ago
There is no argument for censorship, suspension or banning, based on our 1st amendment—- on any of the multiple platforms doing so. I came on here just to check what the “young intellectual tech” community thinks— I consider myself part of
21.
Silicon Valley loses another tech icon(inversezone.com)
2 points by curlyQueue 6y ago|0 comments
22.
by curlyQueue 6y ago
Mushrooms (and mycelium) can perform similar operations. Some fungi can accumulate and translocate heavy metal ions and radioactive isotopes out of a system by drawing them into their mycelia network, where they eventually accumulate in the
23.
by curlyQueue 6y ago
This is so cool! Definitely not a major use case, but it would be awesome to add support for Assyrian/Akkadian names as well. Assyrians have been scattered for centuries, and many have settled in other countries and have organically pi
24.
by curlyQueue 6y ago
Just my tidbit: I am 8 months into my journey after severe burnout (decided to take n amount of time off till I felt “right” last December). I am not a founder, but have worked in high caliber roles for the last few years (I am still fairly