Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ctvo
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
52 ms
·
571.
▲
by
ctvo
5y ago
Many aspects of resumes are easy to cheat. List an undergrad at a more prestigious university while your graduate degree is accurate. There’s a high chance outside of government few will verify. Hell, lie about it all. I know for a fact my
572.
▲
by
ctvo
5y ago
I don’t know what I worry about more, sinkholes swallowing my car whole on the way to work or needing to register on Gettr when it replaces Twitter.
573.
▲
by
ctvo
5y ago
Grew up on this stuff. Still fondly remember the warez bots in channels that would forward emails with archives attached for pirated software, often in 1.44MiB increments since it had to fit on floppy disks. It was a gateway for many of us
574.
▲
by
ctvo
5y ago
Please don't investigate anything else. Everything you posted is wrong. > Her hourly rate is closer to $400/hr. The Berkeley guy said it was $5k/hr because he just took the total pay and divided by hours spent on one thing
575.
▲
by
ctvo
5y ago
Not understanding trade offs in an important process like hiring isn’t great and would be a signal for where not to work.
576.
▲
by
ctvo
5y ago
A resume, for me, is used to communicate as clearly and as accessibly to as many people as possible about your work history and qualifications. We use them as a front line mechanism to filter candidates. The problem with these approaches is
577.
▲
by
ctvo
5y ago
Managed container services (like Amazon ECS) are a sweet spot for me across complexity, cost, and performance. Mid size companies gain much of the modern development workflow (reproducibility, infrastructure as cattle, managed cloud, etc.)
578.
▲
by
ctvo
5y ago
I bit the bullet, gave them my social security number and my mother's maiden name, and tried it. Eh. Not too impressed at this stage, and nothing worth switching from my current (Kitty) setup.
579.
▲
by
ctvo
5y ago
Is that why it's down all the time? bazing I'll show myself out.
580.
▲
by
ctvo
5y ago
To spell it out clearly: Mackenzie Scott will leave running the platform to the people familiar with it. That's exactly why she's the best person to own Twitter and turn it into a public good vs. Elon, who also knows absolutely no
581.
▲
by
ctvo
5y ago
Not really. I picked examples of his most successful aspirations. There's a graveyard of others that have died quietly: - Elon wants to take Tesla private and has the capitalization - Elon wants to rescue Thai children stuck in a cave
582.
▲
by
ctvo
5y ago
> Everybody knows that building a competitor is not the hard part. Everybody knows this? Truth Social needs to be told. The app can barely launch, and got a head start forking Mastadon as far as we know. They have hundreds of millions (a
583.
▲
by
ctvo
5y ago
Off the top of my head and solely? Mackenzie Scott (Bezos)? There are quite a few folks who could create structures for shared (vs. sole) ownership of Twitter as a public good.
584.
▲
by
ctvo
5y ago
Stating his aspirations and actually following through is something else entirely. If we went by what he aspires, we’d be on our second human mission to Mars with fully autonomous vehicles. Elon has the emotional stability of my 13 year old
585.
▲
by
ctvo
5y ago
One interesting thing is that unlike Paul Graham, who thought it was possible to launch a Twitter competitor in a month, Elon understands it’s not that easy to compete with or build a new Twitter. It’s not a particularly expensive company f
586.
▲
by
ctvo
5y ago
To be clear: not criticizing the current state of hiring. I agree nothing better exists, and it's a narrow mindset to think companies do this when there are better approaches. My point is Dropbox asks questions that are beyond what its
587.
▲
by
ctvo
5y ago
Of course, but this is a gradient. Struggling startup may ask a question that 80% of engineers are capable of answering (through luck, exposure, experience -- whatever dimensions). Dropbox asks difficult questions, and it's hard to dis
588.
▲
by
ctvo
5y ago
Bravo on the informative content and presentation. That component that shows the assembly next to syntax highlighted code? chefs kiss
589.
▲
by
ctvo
5y ago
Being new congress members have given them ample free time to learn financial theories and market strategies from MIT OpenCourseware
590.
▲
by
ctvo
5y ago
Is there a reason you’re continuously posting a link to a previous comment like anyone wants to read it? If this is a passion of yours, may I suggest posting about multi cloud strategies and not being entirely dependent on any of the provid
591.
▲
by
ctvo
5y ago
Ah yes. No one else on the internet will rent you servers.
592.
▲
by
ctvo
5y ago
> The assumption was that feature parity with _version 1_ should be attainable in that timeframe. Not the current state of the platform. No, what Paul meant was the "initial version", not Twitter's version 1. Of course he
593.
▲
by
ctvo
5y ago
You can see where some of the HN commenters get their outrageous takes from. You can "reverse engineer" Twitter in a month if you had .01 [1] the traffic and none of the advertising elements. 1 - https://blog.twitter.co
594.
▲
by
ctvo
5y ago
> This means that software development is a failing discipline. Nah. It means many projects don't have strict performance requirements. Mediocre performance, high impact on battery life, slower startup times are OK for these folks.
595.
▲
by
ctvo
5y ago
Looks like their JS library is parsing the syntax within the class attribute and then applying the styles? "Virtual CSS engine" -- I guess? Not sure about the claims re: speed: https://github.com/master-co/sty
596.
▲
by
ctvo
5y ago
Is your workplace Okta? They built a custom internal tool. Until they enumerate exactly what the attacker had access to it’s hard to infer anything.
597.
▲
by
ctvo
5y ago
Or you know, do the polite thing and keep quiet? The sentiments from you, and the original post I was replying to, have inherent privilege baked into them. A South Asian person with family who depends on them for remittances is ignored. A f
598.
▲
by
ctvo
5y ago
What a load of shit. This is the same mindset folks who pop up to yell at some Google engineers have. Why are you using your skills to collect data for adtech! You could be helping bring clean drinking water to the world! People value what
599.
▲
by
ctvo
5y ago
> If you arrive to the railway station 10 minutes +-2 minutes before your train leaves you are using time. In a very real sense. In robotics we sync multiple computers on the robot to about miliseconds, that is using time. In a real sens
600.
▲
by
ctvo
5y ago
> IMO that doesn't automatically mean they should go around calling it revolutionary if it does similar things but better or whatever. It's revolutionary in that it introduces a new capability to the average user (ignoring eith
More ›