Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
csande17
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
61.
▲
by
csande17
5mo ago
https://x.com/jarredsumner/status/2048434628248359284
62.
▲
by
csande17
6mo ago
The first part of the argument is just noticing that Dario is carefully avoiding making factual claims about Anthropic. Like, if the bank asked you if your construction company was profitable, would it be acceptable to respond: "Well,
63.
▲
by
csande17
6mo ago
Zitron has responded to that claim here: https://www.wheresyoured.at/ai-is-really-weird/#does-anthrop... The TL;DR is that Dario likes to talk about imaginary/hypothetical companies a lot in interviews, and those
64.
▲
by
csande17
6mo ago
If my LinkedIn feed is any indication, bizarre inhuman ghouls who wear the names and profile pictures of my college friends like skin-suits and exclusively post AI-generated marketing materials for AI products.
65.
▲
by
csande17
6mo ago
Native macOS developers respected Apple's Human Interface Guidelines for a long time, but even that's declining now that everyone needs to work around all the problems with Liquid Glass.
66.
▲
by
csande17
7mo ago
It's been tried with Chinese Python back in the early 2000s: http://reganmian.net/blog/2008/11/21/chinese-python-translat... It never really took off. I think because computers already require users
67.
▲
by
csande17
7mo ago
/ask and /show are sort of HN's version of content/subject silos; posts there can technically appear on the front page but are comparatively less likely to. I imagine they could add a /slop section for AI posts, and
68.
▲
by
csande17
8mo ago
I should point out that simply not reading a blog post that you're not interested in reading is also an option...
69.
▲
by
csande17
8mo ago
It is funny how that's basically one of the core points the article makes -- and in fact the article paints Hacker News commentors specifically as people who don't see that kind of inherent value in craft and artistry -- but the
70.
▲
by
csande17
8mo ago
> This was so wordy I had to ask an LLM to tell me what the point is. Every time I check this comment section, this sentence jumps out at me again. You "had to" ask an LLM. You "had to".
71.
▲
by
csande17
8mo ago
It's not 10x, but https://www.ft.com/content/5ac2ee5f-f8bd-4f39-a759-3c5c50c8b... has some graphs suggesting a 1.5x increase in metrics like "number of new apps published in the iOS App Store" and "
72.
▲
by
csande17
8mo ago
Moltbook didn't do any of that stuff either, though!
73.
▲
by
csande17
9mo ago
Native speaker here: yeah, it's awkward. It's possible to use a multiplier like "10x" or "5x" as a verb like that, but the object has to be the thing being increased , like "productivity" or "sa
74.
▲
by
csande17
9mo ago
It's an advertisement for noai.duckduckgo.com, a version of DuckDuckGo that disables the AI features and tries to filter out AI-generated content. (Or, if you choose "yes", it's an advertisement for DuckDuckGo's AI
75.
▲
by
csande17
9mo ago
The easiest way to get this is probably Kiwix. You can download a ~100GB file containing all of English Wikipedia as of a particular date, then browse it locally offline. I'm not sure if it's real or not, but the Internet Archive
76.
▲
by
csande17
9mo ago
Wikipedia agrees: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Signs_of_AI_writing#... That's why they're cataloging specific traits that are common in AI-generated text, and only deleting if it either contains ve
77.
▲
by
csande17
9mo ago
It would be deeply funny if SparkFun was referring to Adafruit forwarding inappropriate emails written by SparkFun employees to SparkFun, in an attempt to report their harassment.
78.
▲
by
csande17
9mo ago
Appreciate the transparency! The one thing that doesn't quite add up for me is SparkFun accusing you of "involving a SparkFun customer" in the dispute. Can you comment on what that might be referring to?
79.
▲
by
csande17
9mo ago
Adafruit's response seems to be here: https://forum.pjrc.com/index.php?threads/open-source-teensy-... (via https://blog.adafruit.com/2026/01/12/discontinuing-the-teens... ) > in
80.
▲
by
csande17
10mo ago
They didn't have their own compression algorithm; they used ffmpeg to compress screen recordings to MP4 files at 0.5 FPS. https://kevinchen.co/blog/rewind-ai-app-teardown/
81.
▲
by
csande17
11mo ago
It seems like the point of this is to get AI models to produce the wrong answer if you just copy-paste the text into the UI as a prompt. The website mentions "essay prompts" (i.e. homework assignments) as a use case. It seems to w
82.
▲
by
csande17
11mo ago
I'm not GP, but https://www.trade.gov/survey-international-air-travelers-sia... suggests that in 2024 about 0.4% of European travellers to the US told the government they were coming to receive medical treatment, and
83.
▲
by
csande17
11mo ago
createElement still exists, but the JSX compiler doesn't use it anymore; see https://legacy.reactjs.org/blog/2020/09/22/introducing-the-n... Regardless of whether you use JSX or createElement, you c
84.
▲
by
csande17
11mo ago
I don't think the syntactic sugar works how you describe. JSX components actually desugar to something like: <b>{jsx(MyComponent, { attr: "yes" })</b> (Previously this function was called "React.
85.
▲
by
csande17
1y ago
They have a document that they sometimes describe using the word "specification", but its README clarifies that it's not actually a specification: > The FLS is not intended to be used as the normative specification of the
86.
▲
by
csande17
1y ago
Your comment is downvoted as I write this, but I kind of think Zig's new design agrees with you. It uses the terms "async" and "await", but the API design looks more similar to traditional threading (like Rust
87.
▲
by
csande17
1y ago
In case anyone else was confused: the link/quote in this comment are from the previous "async cancellation issue" write-up, which describes a situation where you "drop" a future: the code in the async function stops
88.
▲
by
csande17
1y ago
I think this sort of small discount is mainly aimed at people who were going to buy the item and eat it immediately regardless. If there's more than one tuna and egg sandwich on the shelf, it doesn't really matter to you which one
89.
▲
by
csande17
1y ago
If you're using the email addresses to provide some specific thing the user asked for, that's not lead gen, that's just "notifications" or "a newsletter" or whatever actual thing you're doing. If some
90.
▲
by
csande17
1y ago
It is a euphemism for "spam". (Or, more precisely, collecting a list of people's contact information to send unsolicited messages to.)
More ›