cryptonym

5 ms·

31.
by cryptonym 2mo ago
You can't number every limit and corner case. You come with precise terms and give a chance for people to defend their case in court. We'll now see if "thousands of partners" is considered as a good match for "infor
32.
by cryptonym 2mo ago
The whole world would be even happier if websites stoped this nonsense tracking of every single action bloating a single webpage with 20Mb of JS, connecting to 50+ domains, impacting accessibility, data usage & interactivity.
33.
by cryptonym 2mo ago
Hide your prompt injection in terms & conditions, plain sight but totally invisible.
34.
by cryptonym 2mo ago
I have seen ISP doing CGNAT on DOD IP space.
35.
by cryptonym 3mo ago
Well... AGI by next month sounds more likely than what you are hoping for.
36.
by cryptonym 3mo ago
People tend to take $100K seriously, especially the ones who tried with more than a mere prompt injection.
37.
by cryptonym 3mo ago
Someone added this to their Gemini 3 Hackathon input > This is the submission that defines the Gemini 3 Hackathon. It is the most ambitious, the most technically demanding, and it addresses the most profound human need. It is the clear a
38.
by cryptonym 3mo ago
You don't need much client-side power to implement addictive UX.
39.
by cryptonym 3mo ago
The security implications of scanning and merging external prompts at scale are going to be interesting.
40.
by cryptonym 3mo ago
Most AI-refugees where quality doesn't matter will embrace the slop, they will become slop experts, slop consultants. Learning to code become less relevant, except if you are looking for a work that really needs it and it will still be
41.
by cryptonym 3mo ago
> Just tell the AI to do it This is the new Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything
42.
by cryptonym 3mo ago
Part of the industry always seek humans able to code with deep understanding. AI is fast but always lacks depth, works better if you are able to pilot it with your knowledge. If that changes, learning code becomes useless. If you learn code
43.
by cryptonym 3mo ago
This is confusing. I can torrent everything and do what I want with it, as long as I don't redistribute the exact same thing? If so, why do we still pay for games and movies?
44.
by cryptonym 3mo ago
Let's say you are right on this. What's the point of hurting yourself? There would be no meaningful benefit.
45.
by cryptonym 3mo ago
What's their interest in you building side-loaded apps instead of using their data hungry services?
46.
by cryptonym 3mo ago
Agree... if they want to sell it, parent company must agree on forever licenses for each user. Regardless of reselling license getting cancelled.
47.
by cryptonym 3mo ago
> All the free, consumer-benefiting services If they stop providing value to users, they are putting their ad business at risk. It's never free, providing value to share holders is a top priority.
48.
by cryptonym 3mo ago
More than code they write, the framework and runtime they use.
49.
by cryptonym 3mo ago
Mostly used by JavaScript parsers and HTML rendering, the rest is for telemetry.
50.
by cryptonym 3mo ago
Spec may not always match your needs. The hardware is tailored for PC Gaming which is dominated by Steam.
51.
by cryptonym 3mo ago
This is a general purpose PC but it's also designed for Steam. Valve will get back a fair amount of revenue on games sold for usage on said machines. They could sell it with little to no margin (maybe they are doing it) while increasin
52.
by cryptonym 3mo ago
Let's play a game > Potentially, the raising interest rates because investors don’t trust the long term stability of the [Guess the country] economic system (more spending on pro-war activities, sluggish economic growth, and higher
53.
by cryptonym 4mo ago
Nuclear should also take the hit. Wars and CO2 are orders of magnitude worse.
54.
by cryptonym 4mo ago
France also produces less CO2, sell electricity at reasonable and stable cost. If fossil fuel weren't massively subsided (impact the environment for free, wars with taxpayer money), Nuclear would have made a massive dent. Producing the
55.
by cryptonym 4mo ago
Let's agree on "Google was providing a service". Current and future state can be questionable. Btw you can still block it.
56.
by cryptonym 4mo ago
Coming with proper user-agent sounds ethical. https://archive.org/details/archive.org_bot Author/publisher are owning their content. Expecting work of others to always be free doesn't sound really ethical.
57.
by cryptonym 4mo ago
Not a fair statement. Google wasn't built on bypassing bot protections. Google is providing a service to the websites they crawl. They try to not crawl when we don't want them (robots.txt, clear user-agent, no-index no-follow...).
58.
by cryptonym 4mo ago
In the post, every time they move, they happen to have neighbors that brings roaches and they must move out again after 2 years...
59.
by cryptonym 4mo ago
If you see more and more of them in your kitchen, you most likely are not cleaning it properly after every meal. Sure, if your kitchen was on the moon, you wouldn't have a bug issue. That would still be dirty.
60.
by cryptonym 4mo ago
Recommended supported length is at least 8k. Of course I don't advocate oversize URLs. That's a point of RFC10008. Let's say we build a service for image transformation or image information extraction. Get isn't practi

More ›