cryptonym

6 ms·

61.
by cryptonym 4mo ago
You are guessing wrong. Thanks, I know specific implementation will come with their limits. This will equally apply to QUERY body size and caching strategy. Are we seriously ok with linking the RFC as source while providing a statement that
62.
by cryptonym 4mo ago
Your link doesn't say URIs are length-limited
63.
by cryptonym 4mo ago
Sure you can provide an image as request body, but you could already do it with b64 query parameter. If you try hard enough, you can poorly use any proposed standard. GET with query parameters already is opaque and makes cache busting trivi
64.
by cryptonym 4mo ago
> prescriptive nonfiction is the canary in the coal mine Self-help is not the canary for other genre. Self-help doesn't comme with significant art. Their consumer gets a better experience through LLM that extracts the substance and
65.
by cryptonym 4mo ago
They don't care much about connecting it to the grid. They'll take whatever is available and cheaper. If gas turbine on trucks are somehow cheaper (reduced regulation, taxation, planning...) than grid, that'll stay as-is in t
66.
by cryptonym 4mo ago
Revenue? In that industry?
67.
by cryptonym 4mo ago
Bad UX (online, onsite, customer service) is not a bug. Ryanair makes you feel like livestock so you experience their cheapness. You must feel like they are milking everything they can to offer absolute lowest possible price. This include n
68.
by cryptonym 4mo ago
They also "reap huge benefits from the tight feedback loop that the compiler provides". When something is easier/requires less context, it tends to work well for both human and LLM.
69.
by cryptonym 4mo ago
It's small if you do it once. If that becomes a pattern and you know you get away with it most of the time, it can boost revenues. Would that be a pattern, stealing $200K to a single family probably is too ambitious. If that's bus
70.
by cryptonym 4mo ago
It provides far better illustration than I can draw. I can focus on solutions while iterating quicker on presentation. TBH I don't care much people not reading it "because it's AI". It's just work, if you don't
71.
by cryptonym 4mo ago
I mostly use it because I'm lazy on the presentation, not so much on the content. I provide full knowledge and content plan in my prompt. I do manual review & fix. Someone informed can tell the content is generated. I don't re
72.
by cryptonym 4mo ago
When you basically don't allow kids to go outside, there is little exposition to potential predator other than family, teacher and similar. There is a selection bias. It doesn't mean it's any safer to generally keep kids outs
73.
by cryptonym 4mo ago
Ofc, it doesn't mean it's any safer outside.
74.
by cryptonym 5mo ago
Are those RFID chips preventing me (or a physical robot) from typing generated text?
75.
by cryptonym 5mo ago
Just like most industries, masses are looking for the cheapest solution with ok-ish perceived quality. If you are looking for purpose, find a niche or do something else. If you want a job, embrace the slop.
76.
by cryptonym 5mo ago
His former company keeps firing people and saying the very reason for that is AI. There sure is hope for C-level to juice more and more. People who are about to join work market may not share the positivity.
77.
by cryptonym 5mo ago
To save disk space /s
78.
by cryptonym 5mo ago
First step would be taking down the website, second step is an apology, third step is bringing back online with new branding and eventually a final word to thank them, share the link and say they remain open to criticism. It's not rock
79.
by cryptonym 5mo ago
I miss data to confirm any of this does significantly improve security. Anecdata: I have yet to meet someone who have been targeted by unknowingly side-loading apps. If they really want to improve security they can work on much more impactf
80.
by cryptonym 5mo ago
Let's not be naive by pretending improving user security is the main purpose of that move.
81.
by cryptonym 5mo ago
rage-baited? I think it's pretty clear to everyone they did a mistake due to lexical proximity with their actual partnership.
82.
by cryptonym 6mo ago
I does apply. Battery should be sold for 5 years+ after EoS and it still must be replaceable without proprietary tools, nor proprietary parts.
83.
by cryptonym 6mo ago
Vendor or even model specific tools plus fighting with glue is not that complicated for someone willing to dedicate the effort, but it won't help recycling economy.
84.
by cryptonym 6mo ago
It also makes recycling much easier.
85.
by cryptonym 6mo ago
They don't have to compute it in real time. They can cut service when they detect it reached the cost and the difference is free of charge. Overcharge protection doesn't have to be free. It could be +5% on prices or a fee of 25% w
86.
by cryptonym 6mo ago
I fully agree with not participating and would go even further: it's far worse than a casino, which was already bad. It's not regulated. It has a stronger impact on the outside world. With bets you can put a target on people job o
87.
by cryptonym 6mo ago
> I don't have a gambling addiction, I just enjoy throwing money away in casinos. I come home thousands of dollars poorer. It's a net return to my finances. Totally healthy. Weird way to validate polymarket.
88.
by cryptonym 6mo ago
Cloudflare is a private company, they might (unwillingly) benefit from hosting illegal services. They don't implement a quick or proactive process to take down content that is obviously illegal. The money made by illegal streaming webs
89.
by cryptonym 6mo ago
By design it's a game where people with inside knowledge or enough power to bend reality can steal money from people with gambling addiction. Automating your addiction might not be the best move.
90.
by cryptonym 6mo ago
1 - Cloudflare is not the entire internet. 2 - They close people who decide to go with a cheap/free shared host. Solutions exist if this market is important to your business.

More ›