crummybowley

6 ms·

1.
by crummybowley 5y ago
No, the bank has at risk the capital loaned, which they payed out. A risk is not a "loss" in a hypothetical amount of money that maybe could be had in the future given market conditions which are not predictable.
2.
by crummybowley 5y ago
I have a mortgage that is fixed interest and not backed by the government in anyway... So I think you might be wrong on how the risk is calculated. I can't see how any new risk is added in a fixed rate. In fact I can't see how a n
3.
by crummybowley 5y ago
They wanted to give Digg some company.
4.
by crummybowley 5y ago
Yeah, maybe I feel was a bad choice of words. Are you blind to a building being set on fire because some people feel some way? Side note, yes, the IT department failed them 100%.
5.
by crummybowley 5y ago
Your vision is always 2020 after the fact. The idea that the city was burning enough would be a good enough fear that who knows what the hell would happen next. Its completely insane that everybody is just okay with millions of tax payer do
6.
by crummybowley 5y ago
I feel like the real problem is people burning police buildings, and the lack of accountability in holding every last person who was involved in setting public property on fire to the maximum extent of the law. But you obviously did not rea
7.
by crummybowley 5y ago
Either your "heavy workouts" are not heavy, or you are the sand guy from the mummy.
8.
by crummybowley 5y ago
I read your comment without reading the article, then I read the article. I am sad :/ While it would make sense for loss prevention at the store, it would make more sense if this feature was extended to the end user.
9.
by crummybowley 5y ago
It seems like we should just stop using ML for feeds. My twitter feed is always hate. I don't actually comment, or engage other tan reading. And I am continuously being suggested post that are clearly bias to somebodies agenda. I also
10.
by crummybowley 5y ago
And this is why Facebook has no business being part of fact checking. While it may look different, this is no different than two folks on the phone getting interrupted by ATT and being told they are incorrect on their assumptions about topi
11.
by crummybowley 5y ago
Even so, the topic is docker. Your storage is else where in docker -- not in docker. If it is in docker, then you are already in trouble. Simple solution is storage is a secondary drive/partition -- still automate OS install.
12.
by crummybowley 5y ago
I stand corrected.
13.
by crummybowley 5y ago
The issue is not docker, the issue is you treat your servers like pets. Folks need to start building systems that destroy all and re-image fresh. Any other way you are just setting your self up for failure.
14.
by crummybowley 5y ago
Yeah, I think the OP was really talking about this individual case. Eg, this guy put his kid in a device that could kill him (maybe). Looking back at the videos from Boston Dynamics, a ton of effort is put in to the failure mode testing. I
15.
by crummybowley 5y ago
lol. If you made the top %1 liquidate all their assets to give to others everything would stop working. You would create more problems than ever. Somebody would have to buy the assets, and because we are doing away with anybody who would ha
16.
by crummybowley 5y ago
I think math can help. Even if we stole 10B from Bezos and gave it out equally to every US citizen... Its ~$30. Is this life changing for anybody in the US? If so what percent. Most beggars on the street clear more than $30 a day, some make
17.
by crummybowley 5y ago
This is basically what google does to get folks to use google products at other companies.
18.
by crummybowley 5y ago
> By your standards, swatting is a perfectly acceptable outcome as long as the victim had the opportunity to mute their harrassers. Folks don't get swatted via tweet, meem, or fb post. They have to pick p the phone and commit a rea
19.
by crummybowley 5y ago
It scales up just fine, but individuals have to take personal responsible for their feelings. As long as we allow folks to flip out and go crazy over bits of text, or even images appearing on their screen that they don't like or are of
20.
by crummybowley 5y ago
This is not a free market issue. Free market does not mean companies can do what they want.
21.
by crummybowley 5y ago
I think you have your order of operations wrongs. The discussion happens, "gut feelings" are had, and then it is science. Without the discussion many of the topis scientist study and figure out the truth would never have happened.
22.
by crummybowley 5y ago
gatekeeping
23.
by crummybowley 5y ago
Also seems like CF jumped the gun on letting their servers serve content to their own servers -- seems like CF fucked up too. Like, when you are CF big you can't just start resolving domains however you feel because folks use your DNS
24.
by crummybowley 5y ago
Just use go.
25.
by crummybowley 5y ago
It really depends on the individual's overhead for context switching. Yes there is a cost, but I also think this cost is not uniform in all people. Also, nobody even on a single task, is using 100% of their capacity. So I would wager t
26.
by crummybowley 6y ago
Yes, but analytics is also used to trick folks into buying a paper back full of shit. A good product, that does what it advertises, does not need analytics. But a bad product, that somebody desperately wants to make successful, or at least
27.
by crummybowley 6y ago
But even if it was a bug... I don't understand why software would prevent somebody opening the gate and letting the inmate out...