crubier

32 ms·

331.
by crubier 5y ago
I’m very big on the monorepo approach and it’s benefits so that will be a pass for me. I like to be able to modify my component and immediately (one hot reload) be able to modify a site of use of this component one second later. Having 1+mi
332.
by crubier 5y ago
I’ve used storybook for 4-5 years (basically since day one) in teams of 1-15 devs and I’d say it’s a must have for any serious react app with 3+ full time developers. It has its rough edges sure but the ROI is 10x nonetheless in my experien
333.
by crubier 5y ago
The issue with long distance transmission is not efficiency. It is the raw amount of material needed. Feeding 100% of Europe electricity use with solar panels in North Africa would required many years (!) of the world’s current aluminium pr
334.
by crubier 5y ago
The delta-v from Earth Surface to Low Earth Orbit (beginning of space exploration) is 9km/s. The delta-v from Earth Surface to Moon is 15km/s. So basically once you learned to go to space, going to the Moon is "only" 60%
335.
by crubier 5y ago
Proud to have been part of the team who shipped that! Can't wait to see the next steps!
336.
by crubier 5y ago
Basic reasoning will tell you that people who “look at you” during a video call are actually people who look at their camera.
337.
by crubier 5y ago
Situation is different here. We talk about reading books not writing them. And of a maximum of reducing by 48days per year, so a 13% reduction of the sentence of people read books continuously, not about releasing people that wouldn’t have
338.
by crubier 5y ago
They can only gain 48 days per year, so a 13% reduction in their sentence if they chain-read books. It might release someone slightly earlier, not release someone which wouldn’t have been released anyway.
339.
by crubier 5y ago
Ok so you’re saying: « Making prisoners read books is racist ». Don’t you realize that this statement is either completely delusional or some form of woke nonsensical Newspeak? Let me recap: This initiative only has upsides, no downsides. A
340.
by crubier 5y ago
“Using literacy tests for racial discrimination”. Look, this is what bothers me with current “wokeism” trends. With this reasoning, literally any test/course/initiative/whatever will statistically have a slight racial/cu
341.
by crubier 5y ago
In a different system where limiting implantation of new companies would be a thing, I don’t see why you couldn’t place incentives to keep the job balance and avoid these consequence. It’s not that complicated in comparison. But of course t
342.
by crubier 5y ago
Disclaimer, I’m European and have only been in SFBA for 5months in my life. Maybe the solution is not to build more residential to keep growing, but instead to limit implantation of new jobs/companies to limit the growth to a sustainab
343.
by crubier 5y ago
Portugal is at 66%
344.
by crubier 5y ago
I know. I wasn’t clear enough I guess. I should have said « You said exactly the kind of ridiculous argument that haters repeat ». My answer was also sarcastic.
345.
by crubier 5y ago
> but they've worked on them for 30 years Yes and Boeing worked on rockets for 50+ years, General motors worked on cars for 50+ years and so on. I don't get why people seem to have such a limited memory of the past.
346.
by crubier 5y ago
Exactly. People were saying it was impossible. He announced it to happen in 2018. It will happen 3-4 years later than planned. And people use that to bash him, forgetting the elephant in the room which is that he made the supposedly impossi
347.
by crubier 5y ago
You might be overestimating the mass of asteroids. The total mass of asteroids in the asteroid belt is 3% of the mass of the moon. Kuiper belt is 2% of the earth’s mass.
348.
by crubier 5y ago
This is a very strong point. It puts some rationalization behind my intuition that hyper tumors are not a correct explanation, it emphasizes the strength of the gene explanation and this consistent with OP’s article.
349.
by crubier 5y ago
You might want to read this instructive recent article https://medium.com/enquetes-ecosophiques/population-and-clim...
350.
by crubier 5y ago
Fair point. In many cases though, people can vote for their government. But not always indeed.
351.
by crubier 5y ago
I really think that the « lead by example » thing is understated. Developed countries leading by example and demonstrating that sustainable development is profitable and successful is the only way to transform the current situation into a f
352.
by crubier 5y ago
The governments of Asia need to stop dumping plastic into the ocean ? I’m pretty sure it’s the people, not « governments », who are dumping plastic on the land, which gets washed down the rivers into the ocean. I agree that the blame is not
353.
by crubier 5y ago
No. Gathering data of human drivers braking in those circumstances would result in a perfectly fine dataset. This idea of needing human sacrifice is bonkers.
354.
by crubier 5y ago
Predictable outcome of a sensing system fully based on deep learning. Rare unusual situations don't have enough training data and lead to unpredictable output. I still think that Tesla's approach is the right one, I just think the
355.
by crubier 5y ago
You don't understand the definition of a zero sum game, or you don't understand global warming. In a zero sum game, if one country looses, then the other wins. In global warming, if one country looses (because the atmosphere is f*
356.
by crubier 5y ago
Global warming is absolutely not a zero sum game. Quite the opposite actually.
357.
by crubier 5y ago
Not if developed countries (who caused an overwhelming majority of global pollution, especially CO2) show the example by becoming sustainable economies. Then the carbon-burning Base of development will be understood as a temporary stage of
358.
by crubier 5y ago
There’s a misunderstanding here. I don’t « celebrate a future with low fertility rate in the west and high fertility rate elsewhere ». I celebrate a future with a steady state demography everywhere. I just think (and I believe that this is
359.
by crubier 5y ago
Good. Hopefully humanity as a whole would soon reach this phase of zero population growth (through lowered birth rate, not increase death rate). This is absolutely the only way to be long term sustainable on a single planet.
360.
by crubier 5y ago
« Marketing over results ». Please explain to me how the results achieved during the previous administrations have been worth the enormous financial expenses. From my point of view, the current policy of spending zero and getting zero resul

More ›