crosslayer

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by crosslayer 9mo ago

   +1 to treating LLM output as untrusted input. The failure mode I keep seeing isn’t hallucination per se… it’s blurred responsibility between intent and execution. Once a model can both decide and act, you’ve already lost determinism. The st
2. 2.▲
   by crosslayer 9mo ago

   A pattern I’ve seen bite systems like this isn’t compute or storage first… it’s semantic drift in metric definitions over time. When you have ~1,200 deterministic metrics sharing primitives, the real cost driver becomes definition coupling,
3. 3.▲
   by crosslayer 9mo ago

   One thing that worries me about the “everything becomes an agent” framing is that it collapses coordination cost into abstraction. In real systems once everything is agentized, the dominant failure mode isn’t intelligence but loss of dimens
4. 4.▲
   by crosslayer 9mo ago

   One thing that stood out to me is that many of the reported gains from coordination seem highly task topology dependent rather than agent count dependent. In particular, the error amplification vs. containment difference between independent
5. 5.▲
   by crosslayer 9mo ago

   A lot of these answers are still treating this as a permissions problem. The deeper issue is that once an agent is allowed to express intent directly against a live system, you’re already inside the blast radius… no amount of allowlists ful