croemer

8 ms·

211.
by croemer 7mo ago
This should have been in the article: Diamond Open Access (or Platinum OA) is a scholarly publishing model where journals and platforms are free for both readers and authors, with no Article Processing Charges (APCs).
212.
by croemer 7mo ago
Not just the heading is LLM-flavoured. So is the writing, e.g. "The shell is a toolbox, not an obstacle course."
213.
by croemer 7mo ago
So the more junk lines the more it's worth. Right. Don't use bogus $ from sloccount. Just say I created a 10k line project.
214.
by croemer 7mo ago
It's gone from 45 when I looked at it an hour ago to 261 just now.
215.
by croemer 7mo ago
Please don't be too much inspired by FastAPI - at least regarding maintainer bus factor and documentation (FastAPI docs are essentially tutorial only), and requiring dozens of hoops to jump through to even open an issue.
216.
by croemer 7mo ago
Same! Only just realized it thanks to your comment.
217.
by croemer 7mo ago
So this means one can't just copy over unsigned apps from previous phone when transferring. As others have suggested, there should be an option skip the 24hr wait when activating at setup time. Or, alternatively, when the previous phon
218.
by croemer 7mo ago
Author gave me the same reply. I just don't want to have to think about whether it's equivalent or not, why use a 2 param model that's strictly less appropriate even if the difference is small.
219.
by croemer 7mo ago
Thanks, indeed I missed this: "here's what ChatGPT suggests:"
220.
by croemer 7mo ago
SWE-bench scores are inflated compared against actual maintainer merge decisions as opposed to an LLM grader.
221.
by croemer 7mo ago
Benchmarks do a few things: 1. Help choose a model from the hundreds out there, or at least help create a shortlist to try. 2. Quantify progress/improvements (or lack thereof) over time. 3. Inform about relative strengths and weaknesse
222.
by croemer 7mo ago
Figure 1 should not fit a straight line as a trend. Scores are 0 to 100%, the straight line will go outside those bounds at sufficiently large times. The simplest reasonable model would be logistic regression. It's also got 2 paramete
223.
by croemer 7mo ago
How do you know what the text would have been without LLM assist? Did I miss something? You are so confident in your claims, yet I don't see the non-LLM-assisted version.
224.
by croemer 10mo ago
One can nicely see the bridge across the river that was burned in the recent attack in Berlin. https://openinframap.org/#15.16/52.425587/13.307235 Everything on the left thereof was then without power for multiple
225.
by croemer 10mo ago
I didn't realize level 1 gave me 11 (eleven) walls at first. I thought it stood for II = roman 2. Maybe use a font that makes the difference between 1 and I clearer.
226.
by croemer 10mo ago
You're forgetting a very important problem: hard to implement. Sugar in drinks and CO2 emissions are easily measured. The definition of what's an ad is much harder.
227.
by croemer 10mo ago
What's the source for the energy per token? I guess this? https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/aug/09/open-ai-c... 18Wh/1000t is on the high end of estimates. But even if it's 10x l
228.
by croemer 10mo ago
That it is mostly LLM words which some of us here don't really like to read as it can be low entropy in language, structure, ideas.
229.
by croemer 10mo ago
Sure, but writing and maintaining such instructions is also work. And not something one thinks about usually until the debugging session with insufficient errors.
230.
by croemer 10mo ago
Indeed, it appears that the limited scope meant the juicy stuff could not be tested. Like exfiltrating other users' data.
231.
by croemer 10mo ago
I happily did not detect strong signs of LLM writing. Fun read, thanks!
232.
by croemer 10mo ago
Because LLMs mostly follow historical practice. And examples for bad error handling are more common (and easier) than good error handling.
233.
by croemer 10mo ago
I can't prove it of course but I stand by it.
234.
by croemer 10mo ago
Agreed. It almost feels like the majority of the top articles reek of LLM writing in bad ways.
235.
by croemer 10mo ago
Tell the AI to keep your comment shorter next time ;)
236.
by croemer 10mo ago
Disagree, it can be learning as long as you build out your mental model while reading. Having educational reading material for the exact thing you're working on is amazing at least for those with interest-driven brains. Science YouTube
237.
by croemer 10mo ago
Don't worry, it's an LLM that wrote it based on the patterns in the text, e.g. "Starting a new project once felt insurmountable. Now, it feels realistic again."
238.
by croemer 10mo ago
Be warned: LLM writing. Lots of negative parallelisms.
239.
by croemer 10mo ago
Or to say it in his own words: "Few individuals have done as much to push the web forward while uplifting its developers, and that legacy will be felt for a long time to come." source: https://addyosmani.com/bio&#x
240.
by croemer 10mo ago
And have a look at the bio: https://addyosmani.com/bio/ > His story isn’t just about writing code, but about inspiring a community to strive for a better web. And perhaps the most exciting chapter is still being wri

More ›