critiqjo

4 ms·

1.
by critiqjo 6y ago
I find the idea very interesting. But what if people leaning on one side of the argument stars a debate because the outcome ended up favoring their side?
2.
by critiqjo 8y ago
The original post was not intended at teaching the reader how to make a passive aggressive conversation effectively. It was actually about making honest and direct communication without biases and preconceptions. The whole post, to me, was
3.
Show HN: Ttf2web – Optimize fonts for the web (segment and generate CSS)(pypi.python.org)
3 points by critiqjo 9y ago|0 comments
4.
by critiqjo 9y ago
No, not "crash the browser" (coz browsers are not supposed to crash no matter the site's content), but that "this site might drain your battery quickly" or something along those lines.
5.
by critiqjo 10y ago
It _is_ a personality trait that you are talking about alright --- your personality trait, that is. So, thanks for sharing your views, patricius.
6.
by critiqjo 10y ago
> If there is no way for me to delete my personal data after i leave the store, i find it distopyan. By "personal data", if you mean the video footage of your shopping, then it will probably be deleted after a few days/wee
7.
by critiqjo 10y ago
Only if mabbo is in the US, right?
8.
by critiqjo 10y ago
> The real question is whether it's onerous enough to act as a deterrent, not whether some people will circumvent it. Deterring what? "Illegal immigration" or "people walking across the border"? If it is the form
9.
by critiqjo 10y ago
I was just randomly zooming in and found a city called Auflington ( http://www.opengeofiction.net/node/19913404 ) --- that's a work of art!! Update: And there are so many like that --- incredibly detailed, ordered a