Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
crgt
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
31.
▲
Modems distributed by AT&T vulnerable
(threatpost.com)
20 points
by
crgt
9y ago
|
12 comments
32.
▲
by
crgt
9y ago
I think you missed the Trig Tablets article earlier this month..
33.
▲
by
crgt
9y ago
Of course! I love these launch posts, they are one of my favorite parts of HN. One other question for you, sparked in part by your response - any plans on your roadmap to support any other (non-Western?) languages for any of the APIs? Chi
34.
▲
by
crgt
9y ago
This passage (from another one of the articles on top of HN right now ( https://www.wired.com/2015/11/null#tpw) ) generates an error when trying to use the Sapien demo: "As a technology journalist, being a Nu
35.
▲
by
crgt
9y ago
Interesting - having seen the linked TED talk, I immediately understood. Maybe worth a watch?
36.
▲
by
crgt
10y ago
It's interesting the assumptions you make about when I see my kids, how much I see my kids and how I balance that with a job I deeply enjoy. Also interesting to see the assumptions made about what kind of people are passionate enough
37.
▲
by
crgt
10y ago
I have 3 kids, survived cancer 2x, am almost 40 and work 50 hrs+/week. I enjoy the work..
38.
▲
by
crgt
10y ago
Do you see the circularity in your reasoning? A machine can't be held responsible because it's not a legal person..and it's not a legal person because it can't be held responsible. You also claim that some legal persons
39.
▲
by
crgt
10y ago
Law: do not kill. Machine kills. It has broken the law, and would, presumably, be subject to asset seizure, temporary deactivation, or, in extreme cases, permanent termination. Much like how other 'persons' break the law and ar
40.
▲
by
crgt
10y ago
And why can't it be held responsible? Presumably, it would have assets that could be seized. Further, as it approaches Strong AI, it might even react to 'deterrence' in the the same way that other 'persons' do.
41.
▲
by
crgt
10y ago
The machine is free to declare other persons the benificiary of any business activities should it decide that is in its best interest.
42.
▲
by
crgt
10y ago
Read the link, and tell me what Indian law has to do with NZ declaring a river a person.
43.
▲
by
crgt
10y ago
The machine, obviously. Same way a corporation is named when they refuse to pay a bill. In our modern world, natural persons are merely a subset of 'persons'. No reason machines couldn't be included in the broader set. Ri
44.
▲
by
crgt
10y ago
Can a machine not hire a lawyer? I can't successfully fight in court on my own behalf..what makes a machine different?
45.
▲
by
crgt
10y ago
If a river can be declared a person, it's not clear to me why a machine can't also be a legal person. Or, for that matter, if corporations have legal personhood, why not machines? http://www.economist.com/news&#
46.
▲
by
crgt
10y ago
We volunteered. Waiting to hear back.
47.
▲
by
crgt
10y ago
If you like FF9, you may like FF BraveExvius too; it's also cross-platform and has a healthy user base.
48.
▲
by
crgt
10y ago
My wife saved my life by making me go to the doctor when I scoffed at it. Wear sunscreen folks.
49.
▲
by
crgt
10y ago
Are you sure this is the case in all states? My understanding is that some states are 1-party consent, tho IANAL. Edit: This seems to back up my understanding that most states are 1-party consent. http://www.dmlp.org/legal
50.
▲
by
crgt
10y ago
I guess I was thinking about it in the context of saving up six months of living expenses. If rent is 4k+ you have to skip a lot lunches to save enough to cover that for six months with no income..
51.
▲
by
crgt
10y ago
Right. And, at least for a family, rent is 3k-4k+. Where's the real cash drain?
52.
▲
by
crgt
10y ago
All that's required for living paycheck to paycheck in the Bay Area is a willingness to pay exorbitant rent. The other stuff is a distraction from the real cash drain.
53.
▲
by
crgt
10y ago
What do you do? Where do you live? People here may be hiring.. ;) At least put some info in your profile..
54.
▲
by
crgt
10y ago
Actually NE Journal of Medicine says that mass smoking cessation would increase total health care costs in long run. So not sure the logic for the disincentives, other than paternalism run amok. "If people stopped smoking, there wou
55.
▲
by
crgt
10y ago
I know it's not PC in SV to say so, but I REALLy hate sin taxes. Smokers die younger, have fewer of the oh-so expensive end-of-life years, cost less as a result and yet still are social pariahs who have the privilege of paying extra ta
56.
▲
by
crgt
10y ago
As an example - we use Crashalytics at work. Even if Google built a parity product, we wouldn't have switched; Crashalytics was a known entity with few pain points. So if Google wanted our data (and others like us..) the only way to
57.
▲
by
crgt
10y ago
This is why technical cofounders that can build a native mobile MVP make sense.
58.
▲
by
crgt
10y ago
Real problems...like HTML email themes? That's a lot of snark directed at other folks' hobbies from someone that seems to get paid for making spam pretty. Glass houses and all that.
59.
▲
by
crgt
10y ago
That was one of the phrases used in the program that taught me to touch type. Stuck with me for decades..and has been almost as useful to me as learning to touch type...
60.
▲
by
crgt
10y ago
That was the CDC's logic here: http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2016/02/04/46560714...
More ›