creyer

4 ms·

1.
by creyer 10y ago
What "better java" means? It means I can build the same stuff but in a better way. Easier to read, to maintain, and at least with the same performance. Scala has a big plus on asynchronicity, but the article doesn't even try
2.
by creyer 10y ago
One should imagine the days without computers... waiting days for a letter to arrive... Even if you don't like computers many of the benefits that come with them you might like... so think of them as a necessary evil.
3.
by creyer 10y ago
IMHO the “Singularity” will be achieved when AI will invent new things. We have only reached the point where AI can only do improvements of something humans have created... Innovation is something hard for humans, so I don't know if w
4.
by creyer 11y ago
The point I was trying to make is that for engineers you can't do a simple math from minutes to productivity. The interruptions are big productivity killers, but all engineers take voluntary breaks. A break helps productivity, but ther
5.
by creyer 11y ago
Nice article, but I can't agree with everything inside. 1. Engineers are not computers, so saving 5 minutes a day will not increase productivity by 1%. Most engineers work with passion, and don't look at the clock. They are focuse
6.
by creyer 11y ago
I think the AI should do more than just correlate some verbs. It should also be capable of understanding concepts like. If I give the following: "John and I are brothers. My mother has a brother named James. " And we ask: "W
7.
by creyer 11y ago
I guess is all about: how can you prove you're not the hacker?
8.
This-land-is-mine(blog.ninapaley.com)
2 points by creyer 12y ago|0 comments
9.
by creyer 12y ago
I wish people would accept drone world wide. Unfortunately in many places they are forbidden :( This is sad, because if tomorrow someone would invent a flying car, something like the taxi from "The Fifth Element", then most probab
10.
by creyer 12y ago
"It is impossible to make imperative programming languages safer by only partially removing implicit side effects" So when we can call a program safe? My personal definition is that a program is safe when it always gives the right
11.
by creyer 12y ago
I like the idea, but can I suggested also on the same note that they can create a high tech condom, which will let you know how many diseases you have avoided each time you wear it, and it might have also a pleasure indicator, so at the en