creesch

9 ms·

91.
by creesch 1y ago
You said a bunch without saying much. It also doesn't track. If the majority of AI work is supposed to be done by agents, capable of doing the entire process including making PRs. Then, why isn't there an explosion in such PRs on
92.
by creesch 1y ago
Not the person you are asking to clarify. But, I can read it in two ways: 1. A huge part of the demographic group visiting HN is biased in favor of AI given the sort of startups YN decides to fund. 2. The large amount of start-ups funded by
93.
by creesch 1y ago
Right, so now we have moved to "well yeah, but you need to use LLM agents". Do you truly not see how you are actually continuing the trend of shifting the goalpost every time someone is critical about the use of LLMs? Critical abo
94.
by creesch 1y ago
> I'm not talking about other people's incorrect promises _and_ I mentioned a number of things in which proper usage today is different from what people were doing before. Alright? What you replied to and the context of this
95.
by creesch 1y ago
The differences can't be that massive given that the hype already made many of these promises well before these models were ever a thing. Basically you are just adding to it with "You just need to use the latest model, anything be
96.
by creesch 1y ago
I'll give you annoying. Given that one is a superset of the other I can't say they are entirely wrong.
97.
by creesch 1y ago
There is more to it. Even on different platforms there are a lot of shared APIs and principles. But yes, you still need a further understanding of the context you are now using the language in. Not to mention that you likely still need to d
98.
by creesch 1y ago
The smiley very much implies that the title shouldn't be taken seriously. I'd say it is right on the mark. To be clear, bullish has a few meanings. But they all boil down to assertively communicating. From your comment I gather yo
99.
by creesch 1y ago
Oef, well that is surely going to influence how people interact (or skip) the article.
100.
by creesch 1y ago
Not saying that you should read the article, but for some context the actual title as ";-)" at the end. Which for some reason is removed here, that should give you a clue that it actually isn't making such claims.
101.
by creesch 1y ago
Either way, it removes an important bit of context. Without the it, it seems exactly like one of those over the top hyped claims the article is critical about. It's going to be interesting what sort of comments this will draw in then.
102.
by creesch 1y ago
Did you drop that ";-)" from the title because you want to showcase how few people actually read articles posted on HN and just respond to titles. Or did you not read further yourself and didn't even notice it? :P
103.
by creesch 1y ago
I'd say that even though available APIs change based on context the premise of the "It's just JavaScript" line is more often that the syntax is still that of JavaScript. Meaning that in many ways it is much easier for
104.
by creesch 1y ago
Maybe it is the fact that they blatantly paint a picture of AI doing flawless production work where the only " bottleneck " is us puny humans needing to review stuff. It exemplifies this race to the bottom where everything needs t
105.
by creesch 1y ago
> It's a well written essay at least. Can I ask you to expand on this? I am curious as I had trouble making my way through it. I am also seeing people stating they gave up trying to understand it. So, I am genuinely curious to hear
106.
by creesch 1y ago
Nah, enough technical folks who do the exact same thing just in highly specific syntax equally difficult to follow for anyone regardless of them being “technical” or not. However, you might be one of the people the person in the post is tal
107.
by creesch 1y ago
I had the same issue. I think that their point boils down to what we consider "technical" as a label on people. Basically that "technical" is more of an identity rather than someone having a specific skillset. Something
108.
by creesch 2y ago
I mean, if you read the rest of the article the subheading fits. So, it doesn't really change the message.
109.
by creesch 2y ago
That, and in many cases they get "stuck" at the firefox version they are based on which means that newer things might not work and more importantly security fixes might not be applied.
110.
by creesch 2y ago
I don't go as far as stopping entirely. But it is part of why it takes me significantly longer to do physical DIY projects as I tend to overanalyze before I get started and the same when I do encounter an issue. > Interestingly I do
111.
by creesch 2y ago
You do you, but hivemind thinking is a real thing. I have seen highly upvoted comments seemingly "debunk" an article where on closer examination it becomes clear they actually didn't read the article either. It quickly become
112.
by creesch 2y ago
This is one application where I simply prefer a GUI for most of the use cases. All the various components of an HTTP call are visually better represented as far as I am concerned . Often enough it is also specifically the payload on both s
113.
by creesch 2y ago
Since you are one of the maintainers of Ollama, maybe you can help me answer a related question. It is great that the software itself is open source, but hosting the models must cost a fortune. I know this is funded by VC money, yet nowhere
114.
by creesch 2y ago
That's generally how that works for new things like this. It is rare for a new thing like this to be adapted by everyone at the exact same time. Certainly within the context of browsers. There is a reason why websites like https:&#x2F
115.
by creesch 2y ago
Comparing to things that do worse is one sure way to never improve though.
116.
by creesch 2y ago
At the same time, let's also not rush to hand wave away issues just because "others are likely worse". Those industries also are an issue, and the question is also applicable there. In fact, the impact of tourism on the envir
117.
by creesch 2y ago
> Some of the most useful tests Ive worked with HAVE had a large GUI tip. The GUI behavior was the most stable surface whose behavior was clearly defined which everybody agreed upon. This might be true, but that might also have said some
118.
by creesch 2y ago
Okay? This seems like a fluff blog post as the trophy concept was coined back in 2018 if I am correct. Coming from wiremock it makes sense given their product, but it is just marketing fluff. Honestly, as long as the GUI tip remains as smal
119.
by creesch 2y ago
Oh boy, the first two pieces of advice basically come down to "be a obedient worker and don't cause too much noise" and have little to nothing to do with being a good co-worker. Though I am writing this from a cultural bias a
120.
by creesch 2y ago
I didn't know twitch uses IRC, though I wouldn't categorize in the same box as traditional channels and networks either. I mean, the protocol might be the same, but it clearly is used in an entirely different context.

More ›