Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
creddit
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
21 ms
·
151.
▲
by
creddit
6y ago
How is it corruption if it's the official policy to auction off some of the vaccine to top bidders? It’s basically a tax on the wealthy.
152.
▲
by
creddit
6y ago
Can you define what a social network is then? As for Matrix, I’m not personally familiar with it but a quick look up suggests it’s a protocol so by my offered explanation, the answer is no.
153.
▲
by
creddit
6y ago
Strongly agree.
154.
▲
by
creddit
6y ago
Does Fastmail limit any of the social features of its product to communications with other Fastmail users or is Fastmail an interface to the generic, open email protocols?
155.
▲
by
creddit
6y ago
Apple's great luck here is that everyone thinks of social media primarily in aesthetic ways that are linked to ideas of social media that they don't like. > there are no recommendations, no feed, no following friends, no status
156.
▲
by
creddit
6y ago
> It's not collecting personal/demographic information Sure is! On my iCloud account, Apple has my address, my location, the location of all of my devices, my Apple Card is tied directly to purchases, and much more! Did you kno
157.
▲
by
creddit
6y ago
By some metrics, iMessage is the biggest messaging service in the US. Arguably, from the POV of the FTC as a US regulator, WhatsApp shouldn't be included but Apple SHOULD be. This is of course ignoring other social features of Apple pr
158.
▲
by
creddit
6y ago
Still a bit slower but much more competitive. Thanks for the additional investigation/validation!
159.
▲
by
creddit
6y ago
> Sure, you can come up with some standard numbers in an hour. But it wouldn't be the most thoughtful analysis, and the decision isn't really about a single efficacy estimate anyway. No one is saying don't be thorough. Wha
160.
▲
by
creddit
6y ago
> Where you think processing the data just means loading up an excel table (or running a CSV through R) Is it possible you could construct an even more ridiculous straw man? > I am certainly frustrated with the speed as well... Yes, m
161.
▲
by
creddit
6y ago
But like even all of that being the case, that’s still no justification for taking 3wks to validate the data. The actual testing process is no different, the only difference is in how quickly approval comes. The same evidence is considered
162.
▲
by
creddit
6y ago
So where am I wrong? Where is this MD, MPH from Johns Hopkins wrong? https://thedispatch.com/p/fda-career-staff-are-delaying-the Why is the UK able to approve it over a week ago but the FDA needs longer?
163.
▲
by
creddit
6y ago
> If someone wanted to take three weeks to analyze an experiment with these kinds of stakes, you’d fire them?! I would absolutely need to start a performance improvement process. They are definitionally 1/3 as productive as they sho
164.
▲
by
creddit
6y ago
I highly doubt it's related to the election, but there is a "conspiracy theory" that is entirely plausible to me which is that the paternalistic leaders of the FDA/CDC believe that by taking longer to "validate"
165.
▲
by
creddit
6y ago
Yeah who cares about the lives being lost in the meantime?
166.
▲
by
creddit
6y ago
"extensive data" is 44K patients!? Wait until I tell you about the extremely extensive data that tech companies at scale deal with every day. I run a large data science organization at a major tech company. If someone told me that
167.
▲
by
creddit
6y ago
What kind of computation do you think it is they are doing on this data? Seriously, it takes at MOST a week to do an extremely deep code review of this. It's not like this is some brand new testing methodology developed ad hoc for this
168.
▲
by
creddit
6y ago
Successful season I assume? Seems like it's over early!
169.
▲
by
creddit
6y ago
Yup, FB is primarily attempting to subvert a fringe European political movement.
170.
▲
by
creddit
6y ago
You can't do that if you wanted it to be a symbol of its own. The use of wrapping "%" is native functionality so making `%>%` into a symbol would break the consistency of that.
171.
▲
by
creddit
6y ago
That's exactly right. This is useful in the context of a large portion of R's most popular data wrangling packages known as the "Tidyverse". These packages used an equivalent pipe function that was non-native and had som
172.
▲
by
creddit
6y ago
But they seem to have had an intuitive grasp for something out of your reach. Seems like a wash on superiority complexes.
173.
▲
by
creddit
6y ago
But the cores are really good in real world, general purpose computing so I'm not sure the ASS (Application Specific Silicon) is more than half the story.
174.
▲
by
creddit
6y ago
When I see articles like this I always think about a few things: 1) Hiring a consulting firm is a great way to get the heat off of your own back. It's amazing this works too, because, at the end of the day, the consultants don't h
175.
▲
by
creddit
6y ago
> Yes, markets can be wrong, but baselessly dismissing market data is plain dumb. Until market is shown wrong, the value that market assigns to something is at least some evidence of it’s true value. Do you have the ability to show that
176.
▲
by
creddit
6y ago
This certainly works but then everything I install runs in Rosetta2. I'd prefer to run as much native as possible which is what my "two brew" solution gives me.
177.
▲
by
creddit
6y ago
Brew is only slightly a mess, in my experience. I've installed brew both in the historical /usr/local location as well as the future home of /opt/homebrew. I then created these two aliases: alias armbrew="&
178.
▲
by
creddit
6y ago
You write about markets like they are omnipotent, benevolent gods which they aren't. Markets fail all the time. It's a large part of what economists spend their time studying. Take an intro to game theory course and you can find a
179.
▲
by
creddit
6y ago
I mean I guess this depends on how one defines waste but under definitions I generally come across, if you could get the same level of security for less electricity in a new scheme, then the old scheme is wasting electricity.
180.
▲
by
creddit
6y ago
"on" seems to be clearly the wrong preposition regardless of country of origin.
More ›