Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
cqqxo4zV46cp
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
47 ms
·
901.
▲
by
cqqxo4zV46cp
3y ago
No. This is an entirely self-centred view. The only people that equate this sort of transparency with genuine security are computer nerds. These tend to be the sorts of people that don’t sit very highly on my internal list of “people who st
902.
▲
by
cqqxo4zV46cp
3y ago
As very recently made evident, Signal spends a significant amount of money maintaining their phone-number-bound infrastructure, with an entirely plausible, reasonable, user-focused reason for doing so. As a Signal user, and donator, I’m 100
903.
▲
by
cqqxo4zV46cp
3y ago
Let’s add a few more 9s to that, just to make it even more realistic.
904.
▲
by
cqqxo4zV46cp
3y ago
Perhaps the world needs fewer Americans that speak so confidently about labour relations in other countries. As usual, 90% of what’s being said on this matter is utterly ill-informed back and forth by Americans that despite their best effor
905.
▲
by
cqqxo4zV46cp
3y ago
Regardless, using housing is pretty disingenuous anyway. It’s a largely second-hand peer-to-peer market. Not like my eggs…I hope.
906.
▲
by
cqqxo4zV46cp
3y ago
It also must be said that the story can be quite different for other ISO standards (e.g. some mentioned in the article). They can obviously get quite in the weeds. 27001 is the one that’s all-encompassing, head in the clouds, sort of stuff
907.
▲
by
cqqxo4zV46cp
3y ago
I work in the K-12 education sector. In basically all jurisdictions this industry is not specifically regulated, but there’s an increasing trend of B2B customers enforcing these standards as contractual requirements. This is usually at the
908.
▲
by
cqqxo4zV46cp
3y ago
The typical person with a geeky interest in security will dig their heels in quite a bit when faced with the reality that most effort does, and should, go toward boring operational opsec.
909.
▲
by
cqqxo4zV46cp
3y ago
OP’s question rejects the premise of your justification. Facebook doesn’t have much of a track record of “doing the right thing” for its users.
910.
▲
by
cqqxo4zV46cp
3y ago
It doesn’t help that the C development community is still largely in denial about the very human cognitive limitations that result in unsafe code being written time and time again.
911.
▲
by
cqqxo4zV46cp
3y ago
Yeah, here it comes. In these conversations you don’t need to ask very many “why”s before it just turns out that the antagonist (you) has an axe to grind about OpenAI, and has added that the their misplaced sense of expertise with regard to
912.
▲
by
cqqxo4zV46cp
3y ago
Especially now that iOS is getting RCS. First-party cross-platform iMessage is nothing more than a nerd’s pipe-dream. And I’m completely fine with that.
913.
▲
by
cqqxo4zV46cp
3y ago
That aspect of it is hardly interesting or unusual. “Company hires ad agency to develop / execute campaign”, and “ad agency either has in-house, or outsources, implementation” is just…how things work. It just happens that for this camp
914.
▲
by
cqqxo4zV46cp
3y ago
That sounds inconvenient for you, but it doesn’t sound controversial.
915.
▲
by
cqqxo4zV46cp
3y ago
Your first point at least qualified itself with a “EVs aren’t all things to all people”, but beyond that, it sounds like you’ve got a very biased sample. My EV will definitely be a net saving over a petrol car. 2.5 years in, and it’s basica
916.
▲
by
cqqxo4zV46cp
3y ago
It’s likely that none of these other countries suffer from American exceptionalism.
917.
▲
by
cqqxo4zV46cp
3y ago
Using airport codes as shorthand for their parent cities is an incredibly incredibly common convention. Well and truly established.
918.
▲
by
cqqxo4zV46cp
3y ago
“Linux is still legal”. Someone’s been reading too much sci-fi.
919.
▲
by
cqqxo4zV46cp
3y ago
Your comment is saying something that everybody already knows. It doesn’t add to the conversation, it’s needless snark.
920.
▲
by
cqqxo4zV46cp
3y ago
You likely aren’t even referring to the right product. Microsoft 365 Copilot is not GitHub Copilot, but good on you for getting your snark in.
921.
▲
by
cqqxo4zV46cp
3y ago
Because anyone that has ever been responsible for anything knows that there’s a difference between something being your fault and something being your problem. Breach notification etc legislation in some jurisdictions will also require that
922.
▲
by
cqqxo4zV46cp
3y ago
Anybody (like GP) that doesn’t understand that this is entirely the nature of security work, should not be making any material decisions about security. The number of times I’ve seen DEVELOPERS neglect to implement materially useful securit
923.
▲
by
cqqxo4zV46cp
3y ago
Me too! It was such a pivotal moment.
924.
▲
by
cqqxo4zV46cp
3y ago
Because unfortunately the world has given developers big heads and convinced them that they know about things that they don’t.
925.
▲
by
cqqxo4zV46cp
3y ago
SO’s … ‘strict’ rules are in part informed by perceived shortcomings in communities that proceeded it. So, imagine something more chaotic :)
926.
▲
by
cqqxo4zV46cp
3y ago
I am genuinely unsure if this is a parody comment. I am assuming that you are fairly green behind the ears? The thing about Big Tech companies is that they hire lots of developers. That’s in large part makes them Big Tech. “Having Apple on