cozeulodorieso

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by cozeulodorieso 13y ago

   Lavabit's explanation of their security, via the Wayback Machine: http://web.archive.org/web/20130530023856/http://lavabit.com...
2. 2.▲
   by cozeulodorieso 13y ago

   I don't think you've been paying attention. Glenn Greenwald (who writes for the Guardian) and Laura Poitras (who's independent, but has had bylines for both the Guardian and WP) interviewed him in his hotel room in Hong Kong.
3. 3.▲
   by cozeulodorieso 13y ago

   Yes, journalism truly has collapsed. That's why these scandals were outed by Reddit and Twitter users, not journalists working at more-than-a-century-old newspapers. </snark>
4. 4.▲
   by cozeulodorieso 13y ago

   Disruption is great. Disruption means doing something else is doing, but much better. AirBNB -- in this context -- isn't being disruptive to the hotel industry. They're doing the same thing, but _worse_. Where legal hotels have consumer pro
5. 5.▲
   by cozeulodorieso 14y ago

   Legal distinctions may have no bearing on your ethical judgments, but they may for other people -- and an explanation of other people's ethical judgments is what you asked about. Edit: I don't wanna get in an internet fight, dude.
6. 6.▲
   by cozeulodorieso 14y ago

   It's not cognitive dissonance; it's a relevant distinction in the law. Adults aren't responsible for the actions of other adults (generally, and with respect to piracy). So while an IP address can identify a group of adults, it can't ever i