Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
cowl
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
22 ms
·
211.
▲
by
cowl
4y ago
That is an absurd question and may I bring the absurdity to it's final form? where do the calories in the plant then come from? Is the next raccomandation to eat CO2 and Sun Rays?
212.
▲
by
cowl
4y ago
Yes I am saying that to get the same Nutritional value that you would get from a cow you would need much more amound of land to grow the plants that would subtitute it. Plants that would require a lot more care and a lot more automation
213.
▲
by
cowl
4y ago
What does capitalism have to do with this? This is a plain morality issue and human nature that does not have anything to do with the form of the economy. The same behaviour and even worse was in plain display in every communist society.
214.
▲
by
cowl
4y ago
No matter where you stand, these type naive recommandations are responsible for some of the greatest enviornmental dissasters of the last century. "Bio"-Fuels being one of the main culprits of deforestation that has created way bi
215.
▲
by
cowl
4y ago
Although technically you are right that the "intrinsic value" is not explicitly stated by SEC, the whole purpose of the Howey Test it to establish whether something has intrinsic Value. At least that's my interpretation of it
216.
▲
by
cowl
4y ago
Unfortunetly these type of Pyramidal schemes always have that factor: "If i just get in early i get out making money and someone else looses". There will alwasy be people ready to make that bet, that they are not late because thos
217.
▲
by
cowl
4y ago
Hmm that's not the SEC's logic though. Winery or Baseball cards have thier own intrinsic value and while their value can be pumped by promoters it does not depend only on that and they are not sold as an investment. You may decide
218.
▲
by
cowl
4y ago
Every one of them adds value. Question the premises (wellformed question) Question the motives/importance (dismisal) Disprove by counter example The only one that can be questioned if it adds something of value is the acceptance and
219.
▲
by
cowl
4y ago
There is an active searching for these credential leaks in the various repositoriues to then be used so this is an exploit. It shows intent, an organised way of searching for vulenrabilities and accomplishment of the task. It's the eq
220.
▲
by
cowl
4y ago
So you predict the top comments For a claim would be: 1. Dismisal 2. Trivialism 3. Non Well Formed Claim 4. I accept the claim 5. Disprove by counter example Are you sure you have not forgotten any tactic of debate to include in you predict
221.
▲
by
cowl
4y ago
Noone is complaiing about the waitlist. Having the waitlist be based on GeoLocation is what is the problem here.
222.
▲
by
cowl
4y ago
>localization We don't want that. Every time Google launches something it takes months for it to understand that just because I'm currently located in country X does not mean I want localization or personalization for that coun
223.
▲
by
cowl
4y ago
A leak by definition is something from inside. This was not. This was an exploit from outside actors that made this data available to the public. Note the difference: > accidentally posting credentials for Atlassian's Envoy setup in
224.
▲
by
cowl
4y ago
https://www.google.com/search?q=define%3A+hacking https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hacker "Reflecting the two types of hackers, there are two definitions of the word "hacker": 1. Originally
225.
▲
by
cowl
4y ago
That is certainly not what is happening and I think that argument is even more dangerous because it means that It is storing copies of potentially copyrighted material. In fact it is precisly this conjecture that is the bases of the latest
226.
▲
by
cowl
4y ago
It will continue to be used by the same customers. Swiss Nationals who don't have much choice and the tax evadors /drug lords/dictators who again chose it because they don't have many options. The legend of the Swiss Ba
227.
▲
by
cowl
4y ago
> in part because of the IT issues posed when employees are dispersed around the country, but also for productivity reasons. I'm sure these supposed IT issues of the employees contributed on the strategy decisions on where to invest
228.
▲
by
cowl
4y ago
No it would not be surpriseg at all at this point. it would be surprising if it was stable for years at 8B and went 1B overnight but for a stock that has lost 3x more than it's current market cap in the last year it's not surprisi
229.
▲
by
cowl
4y ago
USDC is not stable. They have long ago removed their 1 to 1 peg with the USD because it was unsustainable. They are printing money and the value is being kept up only on the speculative expectations of the market. Like all other shitcoins t
230.
▲
by
cowl
4y ago
Doesn't matter what the market expects what matters are the facts. Again the market expected one year ago that CS would be worth 30B. they were wrong. the downfall in unpredictable.
231.
▲
by
cowl
4y ago
For even more relevant perspective, the Market Cap one year ago was 30bln. Given that they went from 30 to 8 in one year, is it suprising that they go from 8 to 1 in one month?
232.
▲
by
cowl
4y ago
What part of the "Dozen 'stable' coin fails in the past years" lesson are you having difficulties with? There can never be a "stable" offer in this space. the stability comes from "free to print money&quo
233.
▲
by
cowl
4y ago
This is a misconception of how our industry works. Yes there are market resesearches with users but often those come after the problem space has been defined. Most of you see in the tech sector today are "Created Needs" by imagini
234.
▲
by
cowl
4y ago
> Computer programs are some of the most structured data. And it's available abundantly out in the open. This is the same Fallacy that we hear since 50 years. All Program requirements are almost the same, just reuse and adapt an exi
235.
▲
by
cowl
4y ago
Yes but even in that case The role will be of a "AI Prompter", it will not be done by the managers because of the time factor. Even though AI can give you the result much faster, building upon it and testing/verifying, then c
236.
▲
by
cowl
4y ago
Well Ofcourse if you talk to communists "it's not enough". In Italy it's practically imposible for a company to fire people unless they have very good reasons too. The court system works very well. These protections are
237.
▲
by
cowl
4y ago
Nothing of these applies to The tech Sector and Especially to my example in Italy. where the Labour protection laws afforded to anyone (even without a Union) are enough. That is the way to go, State laws guarantee the job protection not Uni
238.
▲
by
cowl
4y ago
This is a small Union but Unions in general are a political tool and not for the good of their members. In Italy we had a Union outraged that Tech Employees ere not joining it that it "negotiated"(forced) the government to automat
239.
▲
by
cowl
4y ago
But this will not lower engagment, User will Quote the headline and part of text and you just don't have the original link. The discussion will follow from there and worse than before. Now every discussion can by default be taken out o
240.
▲
by
cowl
4y ago
Punishing Depositors no but punishing them yes. There should be personal finanacial Clawback and potentially even legal conseguences for this type of mismangement. When Their personal wealth is at risk they will be more careful. As it is ri
More ›